It has gone beyond embarrassing

[petegz28]

When you lose the way we did against Cleveland you suddenly find yourself staring at 2-11 and being embarrassed would be an improvement. Today we saw in a nutshell the complete and utter stupidity that Pioli has spent the better part of 4 years putting together.

We bitched about this team early in the season, gave up on them mid-way and now actually root for a loss in hopes for a good draft spot. Unfortunately a new QB, regardless of who it is or how high he is drafted, is not going to help this sorry ass compilation of fail and suck.

Think about the mess Pioli has created in just under 4 years that we now have to clean up in a hurry, somehow.

1. No QB's
2. No WR's...Bowe will walk leaving us with nothing worth a ****
3. No LT, I expect Albert to walk from this abortion
4. No DE's, Dorsey will walk and TJ still sucks
5. No punter..Colquitt can walk this year
6. No secondary, save flowers
7. 1 RB worth a shit
8. No Center worth a ****
9. No HC worth a ****
10. No OC worth a ****
11. No DC worth a ****
12. No ST coach worth a ****
13. No kicker worth a ****

So as I see it, we need at least 2 QB's, 2 WR's, a center, 2 DE's, 2 CB's, 1-2 Safetys, a HC, an OC, a DC, a ST coach, a kicker, a punter and of course a new GM

/rant off

[Flachief58]

Originally Posted by Baby Lee

4. Stepping on one's dick is a pain, one that those few fortunate whose dicks reach the ground must bear.

Yep, it's something I've learned to live with though

[Baby Lee]

Originally Posted by Flachief58

Yep, it's something I've learned to live with though

Guy 1 on bridge pissing: Water's cold.

Guy 2 on bridge pissing: Yeah, deep too.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by Baby Lee

2. You and htis' being vague with the 'draft a QB already' with absolutely no mention of value or qualification wasn't my doing. I may still have a semi-functional sarcasmeter, I don't know if a 'there's a ton of assumed qualifications to my blanket hyperbolic statements you should already know'-meter has even been invented.

3. My hypothetical of a draft where Cousins was the best QB available, even early on in the draft, might be unrealistic, but it is completely defensible when someone is NEARLY SIMULTANEOUSLY stating 'draft QB, any QB, already' and 'Cousins is a guaranteed failure regardless of draft position' as Cousins, regardless of future prospects, undeniably falls under the umbrella of 'any QB.'

The value of the QB was implied. I'm not stupid, despite the fact that every time I argue with you I end up looking so.

OF COURSE I'm not going to take "any QB".

But there's at least 3, if not 5, QBs worthy of a high 1st-round grade in this draft. We're going to have a top 3 pick.

So yes, in light of all that information, which was HEAVILY IMPLIED all along, take a QB, "any QB".

[Chiefnj2]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

But there's at least 3, if not 5, QBs worthy of a high 1st-round grade in this draft. We're going to have a top 3 pick.

.

Who? Right now when guys from ESPN and the NFL network are talking to scouts it seems like there aren't any QB's with a "high" first round grade.

Sure, that will change because QB's always move up the board whether warranted or not, but I think it's a stretch to say 5 will have a top 10 grade.

[Dayze]

we're headed towards LT-ville.

LT or MLB.

[PGM]

Reach for the Dark Penii Dayze.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2

Who? Right now when guys from ESPN and the NFL network are talking to scouts it seems like there aren't any QB's with a "high" first round grade.

Sure, that will change because QB's always move up the board whether warranted or not, but I think it's a stretch to say 5 will have a top 10 grade.

There are 3 that will have a top 10 grade.

Come draft day, there could be (not that there will be) up to 5. I say that because QBs have been over-valued the past couple of years, for sure.

It's all moot anyway.

There are AT LEAST 3 QBs worth a top pick. And we're going to have a top 3 pick, so one of them will be there when we pick. We better take them.

[SNR]

For sure in the top 5:
Geno
Wilson

Possibly in the top 5:
Barkley
Murray

That's as far as I'm willing to go. Four ain't a bad haul if it works that way.

At the worst, you'll see probably 3 of those QBs go in the top 10, and four, five, or possibly even six QBs go in the first round.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by SNR

For sure in the top 5:
Geno
Wilson

Possibly in the top 5:
Barkley
Murray

That's as far as I'm willing to go. Four ain't a bad haul if it works that way.

At the worst, you'll see probably 3 of those QBs go in the top 10, and four, five, or possibly even six QBs go in the first round.

I think you could arguably move Barkley from the 2nd group to the 1st.

But again, the bottom line is that we're going to have a top 3 pick. We're not talking about spending our 1st-round draft pick on EJ Manuel.

[DenverDanChiefsFan]

Originally Posted by Baby Lee

1. I've heard 'such a ****ing lawyer' on here a bajillion times, one for each time the true underlying response was 'OK, I see what you're saying, good point.'

2. You and htis' being vague with the 'draft a QB already' with absolutely no mention of value or qualification wasn't my doing. I may still have a semi-functional sarcasmeter, I don't know if a 'there's a ton of assumed qualifications to my blanket hyperbolic statements you should already know'-meter has even been invented.

3. My hypothetical of a draft where Cousins was the best QB available, even early on in the draft, might be unrealistic, but it is completely defensible when someone is NEARLY SIMULTANEOUSLY stating 'draft QB, any QB, already' and 'Cousins is a guaranteed failure regardless of draft position' as Cousins, regardless of future prospects, undeniably falls under the umbrella of 'any QB.'

4. Stepping on one's dick is a pain, one that those few fortunate whose dicks reach the ground must bear.

Holy shit, this post sounds like Frankie.

[SNR]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

I think you could arguably move Barkley from the 2nd group to the 1st.

But again, the bottom line is that we're going to have a top 3 pick. We're not talking about spending our 1st-round draft pick on EJ Manuel.

Sure. Especially if the top 4 teams selecting look like:

KC
Jacksonville
Philadelphia
Oakland

The first three picks to me just ****ing scream "QB-QB-QB"

[Chief Roundup]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

And he's still not Matt Cassel.

No he isn't nor is he Mark Sanchez, he is Matt Barkley. The thing they all have in common. They suck.

Originally Posted by htismaqe

Yeah, let's **** around and end up getting NOTHING at the QB position.

Just draft a ****ing QB first and let the chips fall where they may.

I would rather get the same level of "nothing" in the 2cd than wasting our #3 overall.

Originally Posted by htismaqe

Exactly.

Hey man, I know Cindy Crawford just asked me if I wanted to **** but damn, she's old, and who knows, maybe Katy Perry will walk by in 30 minutes and ask me. If I go **** Cindy Crawford, I won't be here when Katy Perry walks by. What am I going to do?!?!?!

If you want to **** a fat girl and call her Cindy Crawford that is up to you but you would still be ****ing a fat girl while liing to yourself.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup

I would rather get the same level of "nothing" in the 2cd than wasting our #3 overall.

Who you gonna take at #3 then? Manti?

If you don't take a QB, you're wasting that pick because there's NOBODY worth the #3 overall pick at LT and we don't need Jarvis Jones at all.

[Chief Roundup]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

Who you gonna take at #3 then? Manti?

If you don't take a QB, you're wasting that pick because there's NOBODY worth the #3 overall pick at LT and we don't need Jarvis Jones at all.

Doubt that. Trade down someone else might want Matt Barkley or Jarvis Jones or so on.

[PGM]

Trade down and take who?