Obama Green Lights UN Gun Grab Hours after Election

[BucEyedPea]

Reuters

Just hours after he was reelected U.N. arms treaty is backed. Looks like he really is going to govern like Allende still.

"U.N. delegates and gun control activists have complained that talks collapsed in July largely because Obama feared attacks from Republican rival Mitt Romney if his administration was seen as supporting the pact, a charge Washington denies."

"But the U.N. General Assembly's disarmament committee moved quickly after Obama's win to approve a resolution calling for a new round of talks March 18-28. It passed with 157 votes in favor, none against and 18 abstentions."

"Britain, France and Germany joined China and the United States in support of the resolution."

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/...21107?irpc=932

[durtyrute]

factcheck.org?.....

Is that a real site, perhaps I check factcheck.org to find out

[J Diddy]

Originally Posted by durtyrute

factcheck.org?.....

Is that a real site, perhaps I check factcheck.org to find out

The irony in this is that you typed the website's name twice plus a bunch of other crap and you only had to type it once in the browser. Yes it's real and accepted.

[durtyrute]

Originally Posted by J Diddy

The irony in this is that you typed the website's name twice plus a bunch of other crap and you only had to type it once in the browser. Yes it's real and accepted.

Thank you, god of all that is accepted.

[J Diddy]

Originally Posted by durtyrute

Thank you, god of all that is accepted.

You are welcome.

[FishingRod]

This particular situation doesn’t really alarm me but, those that are pooh-poohing the idea an executive order can’t create policy that is unconstitutional are either naive or just ok because it is "your" guy doing it now.

It is clearly unconstitutional for an American citizen to be abducted, detained, flown out of the country without due process, representation or any charges filed for years, yet it happens. There are those that would argue that executive orders are by their very nature unconstitutional.

[BucEyedPea]

Originally Posted by FishingRod

This particular situation doesn’t really alarm me but, those that are pooh-poohing the idea an executive order can’t create policy that is unconstitutional are either naive or just ok because it is "your" guy doing it now.

It is clearly unconstitutional for an American citizen to be abducted, detained, flown out of the country without due process, representation or any charges filed for years, yet it happens. There are those that would argue that executive orders are by their very nature unconstitutional.

Yeah, next EO that may be coming is Obama's Cybersecurity Executive Order leaving control over the internet to the UN. This is why I say he will govern like Allende—by decree which consolidates power as he leaves out Congress. He famously declared that “we can’t wait” for Congress to act. He favors the UN more. As he spoke about ten years of war ending, he approved a plan for the UN to invade Mali. A president doesn't have this kind of power. Yet, to hear some of the same people criticize Bush for the same stuff is incredible.

[J Diddy]

Originally Posted by FishingRod

This particular situation doesn’t really alarm me but, those that are pooh-poohing the idea an executive order can’t create policy that is unconstitutional are either naive or just ok because it is "your" guy doing it now.

It is clearly unconstitutional for an American citizen to be abducted, detained, flown out of the country without due process, representation or any charges filed for years, yet it happens. There are those that would argue that executive orders are by their very nature unconstitutional.

What particular case do you have an example of?

[La literatura]

Originally Posted by BucEyedPea

Yeah, next EO that may be coming is Obama's Cybersecurity Executive Order leaving control over the internet to the UN. This is why I say he will govern like Allende—by decree which consolidates power as he leaves out Congress. He famously declared that “we can’t wait” for Congress to act. He favors the UN more. As he spoke about ten years of war ending, he approved a plan for the UN to invade Mali. A president doesn't have this kind of power. Yet, to hear some of the same people criticize Bush for the same stuff is incredible.

Seriously, Mali was a great country, and then some terrorists overthrew their leadership and the country is plunging into civil war, and when Mali's democratically elected leaders appeal for help, and the UN wants to send peacekeeping forces, you consider it an invasion?

Your ignorance is so incredibly deep you can't possibly climb out.

[J Diddy]

Originally Posted by Literature

Seriously, Mali was a great country, and then some terrorists overthrew their leadership and the country is plunging into civil war, and when Mali's democratically elected leaders appeal for help, and the UN wants to send peacekeeping forces, you consider it an invasion?

Your ignorance is so incredibly deep you can't possibly climb out.

I have recently tried a new firefox addon called total ignore. It is awesome, whenever someone quotes BEP it shows he quote as "totally ignored." Beats having to listen to her dumb ass.

[LiveSteam]

Originally Posted by J Diddy

I have recently tried a new firefox addon called total ignore. It is awesome, whenever someone quotes BEP it shows he quote as "totally ignored." Beats having to listen to her dumb ass.

[T-post Tom]

It's true. Obama wants your guns. ALL OF THEM. But that's not all he wants. He wants your soul. So get your guns and a Bible...hunker down...this is happening.

[FishingRod]

Originally Posted by J Diddy

What particular case do you have an example of?

Why Jim’s case of course.

Do to information from a reliable unnamed source Jim is suspected of consorting with terrorists. Jim was apprehended sent off to a prison in a foreign country never to be seen again. The Government has no comment and can’t confirm nor deny they had anything to do with Jim’s disappearance because, it may or may not be a matter of national security.

[CoMoChief]

Originally Posted by J Diddy

Real quick. What is your objection to strengthening laws on exports that would make it more difficult to traffic weapons?

because our govt will STILL traffic the weapons like they've been doing for decades.

This bill is designed to limit gun ownership of the American people.

Throughout history, big govt's have never wanted their people armed.

The only way keeping govt from being a total tyranny, is the fact that most Americans own firearms.

[Iowanian]

"When you think it's time to bury them, it's time to dig them up."


**** the UN. **** anyone who thinks the United Nations should have ANY authority of ANY kind over ANY right of ANY American.


**** the UN.

[Iowanian]

Russian Mafia, the Chinese, Somali warlords, Pakistani tribesmen and Mexican drug cartels...........all plan to stop trading in firearms after the UN passes this agreement, because they sure don't want to be caught trading weapons against the wishes of the U.N.