ROn Paul Might Run 3rd Party

[Bo's Pelini]

I spoke with Dr. Paul this afternoon about continuing the fight by running on a third party ticket. I want to share what he said to me and let you know what needs to be done to make this happen. It can happen, but it's going to take some work. If you are willing to support this effort, please share this event and call in:


Mitt Romney won't stand a chance at being president if RP runs 3rd party

http://www.dailypaul.com/252900/upda...sident+2012%29

[BucEyedPea]

Originally Posted by billay

If Ron Paul is so irrelevant thing please tell us why he has the ability to swing a whole general election?

That's why he's in here.

Can't wait for patteeu to cue in for a rinse and repeat.

[BucEyedPea]

Originally Posted by Bewbies

Paul will win the election after his hugely successful primary campaign.

Uhm, that's a strawman.

[Bo's Pelini]

Originally Posted by BucEyedPea

That's why he's in here.

Can't wait for patteeu to cue in for a rinse and repeat.

I'm sure his rebuttal will be some vague talking point he read on RedState combined with us being called cult followers.

[mlyonsd]

Originally Posted by BucEyedPea

You already told me this. It still makes Paul relevant.

Just like jumping off a cliff just to feel what it's like to fly is relevant.

[BucEyedPea]

Originally Posted by mlyonsd

Just like jumping off a cliff just to feel what it's like to fly is relevant.

In your opinion.

[Guru]

You know what. **** it. If each of them had an equal chance of winning, I would vote for Paul hands down. Since my vote is worth less than squat here in Kansas I might as well vote for him.

[dirk digler]

Originally Posted by Guru

If it didn't involve shitting on the country he supposedly loves I would agree with you.

Obviously I am not a RP supporter but he stated the other day he didn't see how anything would change under Romney after his speech.

[Guru]

Matter of fact, all the test sites say Johnson is the most inline with my views, maybe I should just use my worthless vote on him.

[mlyonsd]

Originally Posted by BucEyedPea

In your opinion.

Well yes of course, I'm not trying to change your opinion. But Paul running 3rd party is insane.

[BucEyedPea]

For those thinking Obama alone is the cause of the bad economy. It's a red herring.


Gary North
The Tea Party Economist
Helping you to get through the economic mine field in one piece.

THE ECONOMY

A related thing that bothers me intensely is the fact that the documentary tries to pin the bad economy on Obama. The bad economy should be pinned on Alan Greenspan, with considerable help from his successor.

To suggest that the President of the United States has the power to make the economy worse to imply that he also has the power to make the economy terrible. He has limited power either way, unless he drags us into a war. Bush dragged us into two wars.

Ron Paul always was right for 36 years in not pointing to the President as the main economic problem, but rather the Federal Reserve System. So, any documentary that does not go after the Federal Reserve when it talks about economic problems, but blames the President instead, and also ignores Congress, is doing the general public an enormous disservice. It keeps the Federal Reserve in the background in the thinking of the viewers, when the Federal Reserve ought to be in the foreground, with the presidency in the background. This is basic economics. D’Souza does not know what he is talking about with respect to economics.

http://teapartyeconomist.com/2012/08...ary-if-only-it

[dirk digler]

Originally Posted by mlyonsd

But Paul running 3rd party is insane.

No it is a great ****ing idea. GO RON GO

[Brainiac]

Originally Posted by billay

Youre about of much of a brainiac as Terri Schiavo. Keep in mind your the same guy who screamed about Romneycare being different than Obamacare only to be proven wrong countless times.

You'll never prove that a 70-page plan is the same thing as a 2,000 page plan that costs two trillion dollars. Look past the individual mandate, Billay.

Originally Posted by billay

If Ron Paul is so irrelevant thing please tell us why he has the ability to swing a whole general election?

Try Googling John Anderson for an example in the past (if he hadn't run, Al Gore would have carried Florida and won the Presidency), and Virgil Goode (he is a fringe candidate who could swing the entire general election in 2012).

[mlyonsd]

Originally Posted by dirk digler

No it is a great ****ing idea. GO RON GO

Yeah, pipe down there mister.

[BucEyedPea]

Originally Posted by Guru

Matter of fact, all the test sites say Johnson is the most inline with my views, maybe I should just use my worthless vote on him.

I was reconsidering Mitt again, at one point, after the SC decision. But it's the "replace" part of "repeal and replace" from Mitt's mouth I don't trust, especially with one party rule again with a liberal Republican as president. And he's still praising Romneycare despite it needing federal funds. So then I decided on Gary Johnson.

At time, I think I might consider Mitt again. So today when I was polled by phone they didn't even give Johnson as a choice. That pissed me off.

[mlyonsd]

Originally Posted by BucEyedPea

So today when I was polled by phone they didn't even give Johnson as a choice. That pissed me off.

You actually take those calls?