Creation Seminar 1 - Kent Hovind - Age of the Earth

[KILLER_CLOWN]

[KILLER_CLOWN]

Originally Posted by Dave Lane

Go check YouTube. He's regularly destroyed online. He also won't debate anyone with any debating skills. He's a hacks hack.

I check regularly.

[Dave Lane]

Oh and evolution is not a religion. It's merely the viewpoint that best fits the evidence we have currently in the scientific world.

It's dogma and bias free. If anyone can present new evidence that is testable and contradicts portions of evolution then it will be accepted and a new part of the theory. Unlike religion that is rigid and accepts no change in viewpoint despite massive overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

[J Diddy]

Originally Posted by Dave Lane

Go check YouTube. He's regularly destroyed online. He also won't debate anyone with any debating skills. He's a hacks hack.

I just watched one a minute ago. He doesn't debate, he contradicts. He literally used my God isn't limited by those rules as an answer 4 times when talking about the speed of light.

[KILLER_CLOWN]

Originally Posted by J Diddy

I just watched one a minute ago. He doesn't debate, he contradicts. He literally used my God isn't limited by those rules as an answer 4 times when talking about the speed of light.

Well if he created Light "in theory" he wouldn't be bound by it.

[Dave Lane]

Originally Posted by KILLER_CLOWN

Well if he created Light "in theory" he wouldn't be bound by it.

Dude seriously you are smarter than this. You are not the normal dumbass retard that trolls around DC.

You understand using that argument makes anything you can think up be possibly true.

It's an appealing thought. The ruler and creator of the entire universe is my friend, and I talk with him and he looks out for me and is going to give me a house of gold some day.

And you think liberals are Polly Anna's?

I'd love for it to be true, I really would. The problem is the story is like a playing card. It looks pretty wide and some look really fancy, but there is no depth and the story is razor thin. Take a step back, forget about "your" experiences and look at the story. It's obvious BS.

Ps "your experiences" are shared by every other religion and many non religions. It comes from within you not some external sky daddy.

[ClevelandBronco]

Originally Posted by Dave Lane

Dude seriously you are smarter than this. You are not the normal dumbass retard that trolls around DC.

You understand using that argument makes anything you can think up be possibly true.

It's an appealing thought. The ruler and creator of the entire universe is my friend, and I talk with him and he looks out for me and is going to give me a house of gold some day.

And you think liberals are Polly Anna's?

I'd love for it to be true, I really would. The problem is the story is like a playing card. It looks pretty wide and some look really fancy, but there is no depth and the story is razor thin. Take a step back, forget about "your" experiences and look at the story. It's obvious BS.

Ps "your experiences" are shared by every other religion and many non religions. It comes from within you not some external sky daddy.

I can see why you wouldn't believe in a god like that. I wouldn't either.

My 10 year old daughter has a more mature grasp on what the Kingdom of God is, and what it isn't.

Allow me to quote an intelligent man: "Dude seriously you are smarter than this. You are not the normal dumbass retard that trolls around DC."

[Psyko Tek]

Originally Posted by nstygma

since that story is from God's perspective, isn't it possible that his experience of time is different? for instance, with time dilation or things similar, couldn't a day for a being like God ("who is light"), actually be many millions of years from our perspective? could God speak a word, and instantly something appears. yet, to distant observers, that instant was a long span of time?

k this was all written by some guy 2000? years ago or so God did not writre it
some guy did
it may have come to him inna dream or whatever, was transalted through 3 or so languages
and now it is the word of god?
think about it
does this make sense?
it's like somebody tells you about the movie one of his friends saw, to recommend the book it was based on

[nstygma]

Originally Posted by Psyko Tek

k this was all written by some guy 2000? years ago or so God did not writre it
some guy did
it may have come to him inna dream or whatever, was transalted through 3 or so languages
and now it is the word of god?
think about it
does this make sense?
it's like somebody tells you about the movie one of his friends saw, to recommend the book it was based on

what does that have to do with gravitational time dilation?

[New World Order]

You do know Kent Hovind is in the state pen right?

[New World Order]

This is the thing, the Bible is true, God is real, I believe it. I don't like it, I don't agree with it, but it is what it is.

[petegz28]

Originally Posted by J Diddy

Please provide source for 2. That interested me, but I found nothing agreeing with it.

Don't have time until tonight but you are free to google. Simply put, the moon is a stabalizing force that keeps our planet from spinning at speeds or directions that would be detrimental to life. And remember, I said without a moon we would not have life as we know it. That doesn't mean there would not be life.

[KILLER_CLOWN]

Originally Posted by Dave Lane

Dude seriously you are smarter than this. You are not the normal dumbass retard that trolls around DC.

You understand using that argument makes anything you can think up be possibly true.

It's an appealing thought. The ruler and creator of the entire universe is my friend, and I talk with him and he looks out for me and is going to give me a house of gold some day.

And you think liberals are Polly Anna's?

I'd love for it to be true, I really would. The problem is the story is like a playing card. It looks pretty wide and some look really fancy, but there is no depth and the story is razor thin. Take a step back, forget about "your" experiences and look at the story. It's obvious BS.

Ps "your experiences" are shared by every other religion and many non religions. It comes from within you not some external sky daddy.

Way off base but trust me your opinion is substantive in my eyes, no...really it is..

[J Diddy]

Originally Posted by KILLER_CLOWN

Well if he created Light "in theory" he wouldn't be bound by it.

That is not a good answer.

[KILLER_CLOWN]

Originally Posted by J Diddy

That is not a good answer.

[J Diddy]

Originally Posted by petegz28

Don't have time until tonight but you are free to google. Simply put, the moon is a stabalizing force that keeps our planet from spinning at speeds or directions that would be detrimental to life. And remember, I said without a moon we would not have life as we know it. That doesn't mean there would not be life.

I did google it before I commented. I saw no mention of the earth's rotation going out of control. That's what I wanted to look at.