WHO STOLE MY BRILLIANT ATTEMPT AT HUMOUR AND WHY?

[Mr. Laz]

[Stinger]

Originally Posted by penchief

Anybody ever heard of integrity or respect for others?

Originally Posted by Donger

Yeah, I've heard of it.

Very next post

Originally Posted by Donger

Be quiet, slut.

(oh man my side hurts from laughing at this thread)

[HemiEd]

Originally Posted by 4th and Long

Oh for ****s sake! How can someone whine for 5 pages about NOTHING!?

It is only one page for some of us.

[penchief]

Originally Posted by Donger

Pen, my god, it's not like you posted a thread about something personally important, like losing a family member or something. If you had, I could understand your position.

But, **** me, let it go.

Donger, I'm not personally offended. I have repeatedly stated that this particular case is insignificant. But, even you have to agree that there is a principle involved. If you are going to change somebody else's words you should assign your own name to that change. Whomever changed the title of my thread changed the intent of my thread. They did not attribute that change to themsleves. They misled others who might view that thread to believe that the title of that thread was my intent, even though it was the opposite of my intent.....and more importantly, it was the intent of the person who changed the title.

So, while the topic is insignificant the behavior is not. Especially coming from a moderator. Moderators are supposed to moderate, not insinuate.

[4th and Long]

Originally Posted by HemiEd

It is only one page for some of us.

Well shit! I had to read through 5 friggin pages!

This thread needs to take on a new direction (aka needs hijacked) so ...

_____________________________________________________________

Sisters Mary Catherine, Maria Theresa, Katherine Marie, Rose Frances, and Novice Mary Kathleen left the Convent on a trip to St. Patrick's Cathedral in New York City and were sight-seeing on a Tuesday in July. It was hot and humid in town and their traditional garb was making them so uncomfortable. They decided to stop in at Patty McGuire's Pub for a cold soft drink. Patty had recently added some special legs to his barstools which were the talk of the fashionable eastside neighborhood. All 5 Nuns sat up at the bar and were enjoying their Cokes when Monsignor Riley entered the bar through the front door with Father McGinty for a cold drink when they were shocked and almost fainted at what they saw.

[4th and Long]

Originally Posted by penchief

Donger, I'm not personally offended. I have repeatedly stated that this particular case is insignificant. But, even you have to agree that there is a principle involved. If you are going to change somebody else's words you should assign your own name to that change. Whomever changed the title of my thread changed the intent of my thread. They did not attribute that change to themsleves. They misled others who might view that thread to believe that the title of that thread was my intent, even though it was the opposite of my intent.....and more importantly, it was the intent of the person who changed the title.

So, while the topic is insignificant the behavior is not. Especially coming from a moderator. Moderators are supposed to moderate, not insinuate.

Here's your first lesson of the day.

When posting on this board, nothing is sacred!

Welcome to Chiefs Planet.

[Branden Albert's Huge Balls]

Originally Posted by 4th and Long

Well shit! I had to read through 5 friggin pages!

Why do you have posts per page set so low? I have mine set to max.

[Donger]

Originally Posted by penchief

Donger, I'm not personally offended. I have repeatedly stated that this particular case is insignificant. But, even you have to agree that there is a principle involved. If you are going to change somebody else's words you should assign your own name to that change. Whomever changed the title of my thread changed the intent of my thread. They did not attribute that change to themsleves. They misled others who might view that thread to believe that the title of that thread was my intent, even though it was the opposite of my intent.....and more importantly, it was the intent of the person who changed the title.

So, while the topic is insignificant the behavior is not. Especially coming from a moderator. Moderators are supposed to moderate, not insinuate.

Yeah. Pen, you are simply taking this way too seriously.

That's all.

[HemiEd]

Originally Posted by 4th and Long

Well shit! I had to read through 5 friggin pages!

This thread needs to take on a new direction (aka needs hijacked) so ...

_____________________________________________________________

Sisters Mary Catherine, Maria Theresa, Katherine Marie, Rose Frances, and Novice Mary Kathleen left the Convent on a trip to St. Patrick's Cathedral in New York City and were sight-seeing on a Tuesday in July. It was hot and humid in town and their traditional garb was making them so uncomfortable. They decided to stop in at Patty McGuire's Pub for a cold soft drink. Patty had recently added some special legs to his barstools which were the talk of the fashionable eastside neighborhood. All 5 Nuns sat up at the bar and were enjoying their Cokes when Monsignor Riley entered the bar through the front door with Father McGinty for a cold drink when they were shocked and almost fainted at what they saw.

That should do it.

[Branden Albert's Huge Balls]

Originally Posted by penchief

Donger, I'm not personally offended. I have repeatedly stated that this particular case is insignificant. But, even you have to agree that there is a principle involved. If you are going to change somebody else's words you should assign your own name to that change. Whomever changed the title of my thread changed the intent of my thread. They did not attribute that change to themsleves. They misled others who might view that thread to believe that the title of that thread was my intent, even though it was the opposite of my intent.....and more importantly, it was the intent of the person who changed the title.

So, while the topic is insignificant the behavior is not. Especially coming from a moderator. Moderators are supposed to moderate, not insinuate.

Your original thread was stupid. The mods got tired of stupid threads. There's been too many today.

JESUS ****ING CHRIST WHO THE **** CARES? LIGHTEN UP!

[4th and Long]

Originally Posted by gochiefs

Why do you have posts per page set so low? I have mine set to max.

Because ... I don't want to be like you in any way, shape or form?

[4th and Long]

Originally Posted by HemiEd

That should do it.

[penchief]

Originally Posted by 4th and Long

Questions should end with a question mark, not an exclamation point.

Refer to the DC planet. You will see that I ask many, many questions that are never answered. All of which are puncuated with a quesiton mark.

[Donger]

Originally Posted by Stinger

Very next post



(oh man my side hurts from laughing at this thread)

What can I say? chiefs4me brings out my warm and fuzzy side.

[Branden Albert's Huge Balls]

Originally Posted by 4th and Long

Because ... I don't want to be like you in any way, shape or form?

You are lying.

You revealed that you have your posts per page set to a low number earlier in this thread. Before I revealed that I have mine set to max.

Furthermore, there is no way you could have known prior to my revelation of my posts per page setting.

You are lying.

[Branden Albert's Huge Balls]

Originally Posted by Donger

What can I say? chiefs4me brings out my warm and fuzzy side.

So what do you call women when you hate them?