Pick #33. Round 2. What to do?

[teedubya]

I'm thinking we are going to get some first round talent slip to us at this pick.

Which position would you draft in the 2nd? Assuming that we picked up a QB in round one? Receiver?

[O.city]

I'd like to see Xavier Rhodes fall into the second round.


Geno
Rhodes
Best WR left
FS
DL


Would be a way to go.

[KurtCobain]

Originally Posted by Guru

That is probably where we pick our QB.

That's essentially where brees was picked

[Hootie]

Originally Posted by SNR

Three years ago the rule was still:

If you don't have a franchise QB and a potential franchise prospect is available, you take the QB all the time, every time. No matter what.

Is that why the board consensus was HELL NO to Matt Ryan?

[KCrockaholic]

Originally Posted by DTLB58

You know this isn't a bad pick if this team had it's QB and Bowe was committed to being a #1 WR (and is paid) and a coaching staff knew what the hell they were doing with the rest of the talent already on this team hence... Moeaki,Baldwin and Breaston. If these guys are gone or aren't utilized properly again, then we need to draft a WR.

If we take Geno in the first, then why not take Austin. Austin might still be a 1st round guy. Too early to say... But if the guy was about 2 inches taller, he'd no question be a 1st round guy.

Like I've said before, he reminds me a lot of a shorter Percy Harvin in the way he can be used on the field. He's extremely fast. Can play WR, HB (great 3rd down back), and would be an electric KR/PR if nothing else. Aside from injury Austin is as sure of a thing as can be IMO. Playmakers are never overvalued.

[Hootie]

at this point, briefly seeing and reading about all of the QB prospects...it's really Geno or bust at #1 for me.

He fits the mold of the "new age" QB and from what I read he's a hard worker and a film guy as well, with all of the atheticism to boot.

[BossChief]

Originally Posted by O.city

They just want the Chiefs back to the 90's Chiefs. Like it's been said on here, alot of Chiefs fans just want Arrowhead to be what it once was and the Chiefs to be good enough to get it back to that.


CP is the 1%.

If we had a QB like Geno Smith in the 90s, we would have had a chance to win championships.

[KCrockaholic]

Originally Posted by Argo

That's essentially where brees was picked

So we pray that Aaron Murray is there.

[Chief_For_Life58]

someone who sucks

[O.city]

Once you have your franchise QB, drafting becomes alot easier.


You can take more flyer picks and aren't really handicapped into picks. You can set your board and just sit and see what happens.

[KCrockaholic]

Originally Posted by BossChief

If we had a QB like Geno Smith in the 90s, we would have had a chance to win championships.

I haven't paid a ton of attention to your opinion on Smith, but how certain are you in him being a great, franchise QB?

[O.city]

Originally Posted by BossChief

If we had a QB like Geno Smith in the 90s, we would have had a chance to win championships.

If we had an offense that could consistently score 20 points we could have contended for championships.

[DTLB58]

Originally Posted by O.city

They just want the Chiefs back to the 90's Chiefs. Like it's been said on here, alot of Chiefs fans just want Arrowhead to be what it once was and the Chiefs to be good enough to get it back to that.


CP is the 1%.

Yea that was a fun party wasn't it? And someone made a ton of money.
But ya just always had that feeling it wasn't gonna be quite good enough.

We need to avoid the coach that just wants to keep it close going into the 4th Quarter so we just got a chance.

[Hootie]

for Christ's sake if we take Geno at #1 and Murray is there at #34 and we take him to sign me the **** up...what's the worst that happens? Geno explodes and we turn around and trade Murray in 3 years for a good pick?

[Sorter]

BPA.

Personally, if a highly rated guy who can play he 3-tech falls, I'd take him over a WR or DB.

Those would be my next 2 options though.

[BossChief]

Originally Posted by KCrockaholic

If we take Geno in the first, then why not take Austin. Austin might still be a 1st round guy. Too early to say... But if the guy was about 2 inches taller, he'd no question be a 1st round guy.

Like I've said before, he reminds me a lot of a shorter Percy Harvin in the way he can be used on the field. He's extremely fast. Can play WR, HB (great 3rd down back), and would be an electric KR/PR if nothing else. Aside from injury Austin is as sure of a thing as can be IMO. Playmakers are never overvalued.

Austin is a very similar player to Dexter McCluster...except he has much better long speed.

I bet their shuttle/bench and other measurable at the combine are comparable.

People clown on Dexters 40 time, but not too often praise him for his elite shuttle time (4.06) and bench (for a man his size, 22 reps is pretty damn good)