NFL Draft Anybody here ever actually run the 40? - Page 28

Direckshun · 03-02-2011, 09:15 PM

Curious to see if we have any other athletes out here.

I don't have a stopwatch. Maybe I should see if one of my friends does and get some jackass to time me.

What's your 40 time?

Jenson71 · 03-04-2011, 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Yeah, you're right.

No one was fast in the 70's or 80's and it's hard to believe that anyone actually had sex, due to the hairy pussies and all.

Everything that happened before you were born is a fabrication.

I take it you disagree with me that athletes are better conditioned today than 30-40 years ago.

**dirk digler** · 03-04-2011, 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO

nope. i was wrong on the poster.

hootie didnt just pull JC out of his ass. dirk said he ran a 4.3 and hootie laughed about him being faster than JC (or even as fast)

sorry guys but most i'm with hootie on this one.

actually i'm more with deez, find his post and read it.

I readily admit my coach could have timed me wrong I was just a teenager and that is what he told me multiple times along with my track coach. I will also add it was a lot different back in the mid 80's and I know I wasn't going to play football at a higher level because I was 5'3" and barely weighed 120 lbs. I might have been able to play in the midget league though.

**DaneMcCloud** · 03-04-2011, 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jenson71

I take it you disagree with me that athletes are better conditioned today than 30-40 years ago.

Yeah, that's exactly what I disagree with.

Otter · 03-04-2011, 04:06 PM

It's time to be swept up to the top of your ivory tower by angels blowing trumpets and bear the cross of making Dane a better person Jenson!!!!

God bless you!

Jenson71 · 03-04-2011, 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Yeah, that's exactly what I disagree with.

So you agree that athletes are better conditioned today than they were 30-40 years ago?

ISUJeff · 03-04-2011, 04:59 PM

I'm kinda late to this party, and I'm sure no one will believe me, but . . .
I ran a 6.0 forty my freshman year of high school.
Think I was weighing about 145 back then, could almost bench my weight too.

**SAUTO** · 03-04-2011, 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler

I readily admit my coach could have timed me wrong I was just a teenager and that is what he told me multiple times along with my track coach. I will also add it was a lot different back in the mid 80's and I know I wasn't going to play football at a higher level because I was 5'3" and barely weighed 120 lbs. I might have been able to play in the midget league though.

dude i was NOT calling you or anyone else a liar. not once have i done that. sorry if you felt that way.

the times you threw out there were FAST. i dont care if you played football or not, if you were that fast you should have been able to get better with actual training and someone let you down by not pushing you farther down the road to track success.

and i mean that

**SAUTO** · 03-04-2011, 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Go **** yourself, Asshole.

You and your "proof" can take a nice ride on a Sybian right up your ass.

again typical dane here.

i already said i didnt have any proof and also pointed out that you didnt either

**SAUTO** · 03-04-2011, 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

More ****ing nonsense from a ****ing moron.

Go **** yourself with a tire iron, idiot.

made perfect sense dane.

you cant use football success as proof as to what their time was on one hand and then on the other hand say that just because someone is fast doesnt mean they would be successful at football.

i wouldnt expect you to understand though.

and dane, its not nice to call names.

Al Bundy · 03-04-2011, 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC

Like bass fishing in a stocked pond...

He does make a lot of assumptions though.

ThaVirus · 03-04-2011, 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Yeah, you're right.

No one was fast in the 70's or 80's and it's hard to believe that anyone actually had sex, due to the hairy pussies and all.

Everything that happened before you were born is a fabrication.

I laughed like shit after reading this post, but you're stretching a bit, Dane.

Pablo · 03-04-2011, 06:00 PM

Hootie is correct for the most part.

This is CP after-all.

Where we only date/marry 9/10's.

We all have 8" cocks.

We can all bench 300 pounds.

We all throw a football 70 yards and a baseball 90+mph.

Nobody drives domestic cars.

Nobody drinks domestic beer.

Everybody has an upscale home on 2 acres of perfectly manicured lawn.

And everybody ran a 4.5 forty.

**DaneMcCloud** · 03-04-2011, 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO

again typical dane here.

i already said i didnt have any proof and also pointed out that you didnt either

Jason, it's impossible to prove a negative.

The facts are this: 1981-1983, hand timed, lots of success for the program and scores of its players.

You can "question" whether or not it was a "true" time all you want. It doesn't matter a damn bit because it was nearly 30 years ago.

But based on the consistently of the timings, the quality of play and the ability of guys to compete at a high level against other similarly timed guys, I'd say they were accurate for the day.

It's downright stupid to imply otherwise, especially since you cannot prove that those times were incorrect.

**DaneMcCloud** · 03-04-2011, 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PostRockPablo

And everybody ran a 4.5 forty.

Three people in this thread have made that claim.

Please explain how that's "everybody".

It's good to know that all of you "Sub-25 year-olds" stick together.

Our nation is in great hands.

**SAUTO** · 03-04-2011, 06:04 PM

Lol
What
Ever

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Jason, it's impossible to prove a negative.

The facts are this: 1981-1983, hand timed, lots of success for the program and scores of its players.

You can "question" whether or not it was a "true" time all you want. It doesn't matter a damn bit because it was nearly 30 years ago.

But based on the consistently of the timings, the quality of play and the ability of guys to compete at a high level against other similarly timed guys, I'd say they were accurate for the day.

It's downright stupid to imply otherwise, especially since you cannot prove that those times were incorrect.

Posted via Mobile Device

03-02-2011, 09:15 PM
Direckshun __ Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Springpatch Casino cash: $4413447	Anybody here ever actually run the 40? Curious to see if we have any other athletes out here. I don't have a stopwatch. Maybe I should see if one of my friends does and get some jackass to time me. What's your 40 time?
Posts: 59,254

03-04-2011, 04:59 PM	#411
ISUJeff Starter Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Minneapolis Casino cash: $9402634	I'm kinda late to this party, and I'm sure no one will believe me, but . . . I ran a 6.0 forty my freshman year of high school. Think I was weighing about 145 back then, could almost bench my weight too.
Posts: 189

03-04-2011, 06:00 PM	#417
Pablo Ultrabanned Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: KCMO Casino cash: $2059356	Hootie is correct for the most part. This is CP after-all. Where we only date/marry 9/10's. We all have 8" cocks. We can all bench 300 pounds. We all throw a football 70 yards and a baseball 90+mph. Nobody drives domestic cars. Nobody drinks domestic beer. Everybody has an upscale home on 2 acres of perfectly manicured lawn. And everybody ran a 4.5 forty.
Posts: 40,233