Chiefs To all the "THIS OL SUCKS WAAAH" folks: - Page 8

**RealSNR** · 08-28-2015, 11:40 AM

I have a question that not one of you has answered for me except for Saccopoo, and he doesn't share your opinion on how the OL will perform this year.

What the hell was Dorsey supposed to do?

No, don't ****ing say, "They should have drafted OL like the Cowboys do!" That takes years.

Imagine you're Dorsey. The 2014 season has ended. You view the OL as crucially important like you do.

What moves are you going to make that will RESPONSIBLY improve the offensive line to your satisfaction?

**RealSNR** · 08-28-2015, 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stop, Chiefs

And three of them are still here.

Who's that?

**RealSNR** · 08-28-2015, 04:10 PM

Also, Chief Roundup, aren't you the stupid mother****er that wants bannings to occur for people who bring up QB problems in random threads?

Get ****ed, you ****ing hypocrite. Not once did I mention the QB position anywhere in this ****ing thread, and here your ass comes in and tries to start that shit up when you're the moron who complains about all the ruined topics of conversations because "trolls" can't keep to themselves about Alex Smith.

Hammock Parties · 08-28-2015, 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR

Who's that?

Fisher, Stephenson and Allen.

Their NFL careers are mostly comprised of sucking ass. And if you disagree, you are lying to yourself.

To expect all three of them to suddenly improve to even average is fantasy. I'm expecting, at most, one of them is acceptable this year.

**RealSNR** · 08-28-2015, 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stop, Chiefs

Fisher, Stephenson and Allen.

Their NFL careers are mostly comprised of sucking ass. And if you disagree, you are lying to yourself.

So what was Dorsey supposed to do about them, again? Cut them all and replace them with.... what?

chiefzilla1501 · 08-28-2015, 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup

I wouldn't be sticking my head in the sand like you are thinking it is all because of the QB.

It's not entirely the QB but look at End of year offensive line in 2013 vs beginning of 2013 Oline. The end of 2013 Oline was not talented but they looked fine. I would say QB play had a lot to do with that improvement. When Alex is more aggressive, the ol blocks better.

chiefzilla1501 · 08-28-2015, 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stop, Chiefs

Fisher, Stephenson and Allen.

Their NFL careers are mostly comprised of sucking ass. And if you disagree, you are lying to yourself.

To expect all three of them to suddenly improve to even average is fantasy. I'm expecting, at most, one of them is acceptable this year.

Those 3 were on the end of year 2013 Oline. That line looked fine.

TEX · 08-28-2015, 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

Those 3 were on the end of year 2013 Oline. That line looked fine.

To you Im sure it did. You, and dipshit Cosmo, advocated all last off season for a JAG OL, and you got it....

**RealSNR** · 08-28-2015, 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX

To you Im sure it did. You advocated for a JAG OL, and you got it....

The 2013 OL as they played towards the end of the season isn't good enough for you?

This is why I keep bringing up the 2003 OL around you. Because your standards and expectations are ****ing ridiculous for how an OL should have to perform.

Hammock Parties · 08-28-2015, 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR

So what was Dorsey supposed to do about them, again? Cut them all and replace them with.... what?

He's had three years to build a line. That's not an excuse.

Anything was a better option than counting on a guy who couldn't be counted on at all last season, though.

Seriously. He went into the offseason thinking "Huh! I have a guy that was a total nimrod last season. I will slide him into a starting spot immediately."

But I guess that's what you have to do when you paint yourself into a corner over the course of three offseasons.

Sandy Vagina · 08-28-2015, 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

When Alex is more aggressive, the ol blocks better.

backwards

**DaneMcCloud** · 08-28-2015, 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stop, Chiefs

He's had three years to build a line. That's not an excuse.

While "building" a defensive line, a secondary, a WR corp, a TE corp, finding depth at running back, not to mention, ILBer's.

Yeah, no "excuses".

TEX · 08-28-2015, 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stop, Chiefs

He's had three years to build a line. That's not an excuse.

Anything was a better option than counting on a guy who couldn't be counted on at all last season, though.

Seriously. He went into the offseason thinking "Huh! I have a guy that was a total nimrod last season. I will slide him into a starting spot immediately."

But I guess that's what you have to do when you paint yourself into a corner over the course of three offseasons.

You're on to something because its not a bi product of just ONE off season. They let dude's walk last year and went with JAGS. This shit took time. Furthermore, it was a focus this off season. The guys here aren't good enough to play "just good enough." They LOST one guy who could play and brought in ONE guy who can actually play now so that's a wash. They drafted one who might be decent some day, but is not ready now and overestimated those who were here. Gonna take more than just shuffling the deck with the players on hand. I mean, WHY rearrange the furniture on the Titanic?

On a side note, we do have lots of talent in other areas so I commend the Chiefs for that.

**DaneMcCloud** · 08-28-2015, 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX

Exactly, its not a bi product of just ONE off season. They let dude's walk last year and went with JAGS. This shit took time. Furthermore, it was a focus this off season. The guys here aren't good enough to play "just good enough." They LOST one guy who could play and brought in ONE guy who can actually play now so that's a wash. They drafted one who might be decent some day, but is not ready now and overestimated those who were here. Gonna take more than just shuffling the deck with the players on hand. I mean, WHY rearrange the furniture on the Titanic?

Albert's garbage and missed nine games. Schwartz is garbage and missed nearly the whole season. Asamoah is beyond garbage.

Dorsey's replaced Hudson with Morse and expects Fisher, Fulton, Stephenson, LDRT and Allen to improve.

I don't see the problem.

**Dave Lane** · 08-28-2015, 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR

FISHER = UNKNOWN

MORSE = ROOKIE

EVERYONE = GARBAGE

OL = SUCK

/idiots

They are idiots. This line is going to be good. The QB behind it may improve to meh+.

milkman · 08-28-2015, 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

True and I've been critical of this decision since changes were made the second week of training camp.

I think Reid is taking the long view on this.

Kush and Fulton have shown that they are solid, but both are limited.

Andy Reid's offense needs mobile O-Lineman that can pull and get out and block in space.

Neither of those aforementioned guys can do that.

Morse has a stronger, more solid, base, and he's more athletic and far more mobile than Kush.

LDT is far more athletic and moble than Fulton.

Reid is willing to struggle through the growing pains to find out how they progress.

As for Fanaika, he is trying to find a spot to justify the money spent.

08-28-2015, 11:40 AM
RealSNR Special Teams ACE!!! Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Where the hell is SNR Casino cash: $2410208	To all the "THIS OL SUCKS WAAAH" folks: I have a question that not one of you has answered for me except for Saccopoo, and he doesn't share your opinion on how the OL will perform this year. What the hell was Dorsey supposed to do? No, don't ****ing say, "They should have drafted OL like the Cowboys do!" That takes years. Imagine you're Dorsey. The 2014 season has ended. You view the OL as crucially important like you do. What moves are you going to make that will RESPONSIBLY improve the offensive line to your satisfaction?
Posts: 90,315