Chiefs Chiefs have agreed to terms with QB Brady Quinn - Page 28

ShowtimeSBMVP · 03-17-2012, 05:16 PM

Kansas City Chiefs‏@kcchiefsReply
Retweet

Favorite
· Open

Chiefs have agreed to terms with QB Brady Quinn - more details soon on http://kcchiefs.com #chiefs

WV · 03-18-2012, 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Messier

I maintain there is no franchise QB this year to pick up. You can say Manning, but he's doing is "Bachelor" search, and KC isn't getting a rose, but that's only a 2 or 3 year answer anyway. In the draft I'm not excited about anyone other than RG3 and Luck. I don't really want to give Henne or Orton a 5 year deal, and start all over down the Cassel road. So, for now we have Cassel and Quinn. I badly want a franchise QB, but this isn't the year.

A lot of sense here. Perhaps with only Casshole and Quinn to compete with it will make Stanzi look all the better.

And anyone who had the pipe dream of us trading up for Luck or RG3 was really smoking some good shit.

King_Chief_Fan · 03-18-2012, 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Messier

I maintain there is no franchise QB this year to pick up. You can say Manning, but he's doing is "Bachelor" search, and KC isn't getting a rose, but that's only a 2 or 3 year answer anyway. In the draft I'm not excited about anyone other than RG3 and Luck. I don't really want to give Henne or Orton a 5 year deal, and start all over down the Cassel road. So, for now we have Cassel and Quinn. I badly want a franchise QB, but this isn't the year.

you shall get rep for this....way too much common sense for many on this board

**ChiefGator** · 03-18-2012, 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Messier

So, for now we have Cassel and Quinn.

Keep doubting Stanzi... at your own peril.

**gblowfish** · 03-18-2012, 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Messier

I maintain there is no franchise QB this year to pick up. You can say Manning, but he's doing is "Bachelor" search, and KC isn't getting a rose, but that's only a 2 or 3 year answer anyway. In the draft I'm not excited about anyone other than RG3 and Luck. I don't really want to give Henne or Orton a 5 year deal, and start all over down the Cassel road. So, for now we have Cassel and Quinn. I badly want a franchise QB, but this isn't the year.

Messier is a mult for Scott Pioli?

CaliforniaChief · 03-18-2012, 09:49 AM

Signing Winston only makes me lament one thing: That we didn't trade the farm of draft picks away to land RG3. We still would have had some late-round picks to fill in depth where needed, and would have our franchise QB.

Of all the teams making a push to give up draft picks for RG3, we were the team who could most afford to lose the picks.

**DaFace** · 03-18-2012, 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaliforniaChief

Signing Winston only makes me lament one thing: That we didn't trade the farm of draft picks away to land RG3. We still would have had some late-round picks to fill in depth where needed, and would have our franchise QB.

Of all the teams making a push to give up draft picks for RG3, we were the team who could most afford to lose the picks.

How many years worth of picks were you willing to give up?

TheGuardian · 03-18-2012, 10:04 AM

OMG.

We didn't have the ammo to trade for RGIII! Nor, should we have tried to create it. It's too ****ing much to give up. JFC.........

**bevischief** · 03-18-2012, 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaliforniaChief

Signing Winston only makes me lament one thing: That we didn't trade the farm of draft picks away to land RG3. We still would have had some late-round picks to fill in depth where needed, and would have our franchise QB.

Of all the teams making a push to give up draft picks for RG3, we were the team who could most afford to lose the picks.

Share whatever you are smoking...

patteeu · 03-18-2012, 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

at the fact that "dispositive" would probably yield one (now two) results via advanced search.

76 (now 77).

L.A. Chieffan · 03-18-2012, 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan

Honestly this is better than drafting a first round qb because quinn was ALREADY drafted in the first round but nobody really knows what he's capable of yet. Its like we got a first round qb FOR FREE. Pioli is a goddam genius

this.

Fat Elvis · 03-18-2012, 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace

How many years worth of picks were you willing to give up?

How many years are you willing to watch Cassel?

TheGuardian · 03-18-2012, 10:12 AM

I'm def willing to see what happens with Quinn.

He was slated to go #2 overall but fell. Sounds like Rodgers but without a good situation to be in.

I just hope that the reason we went after him is because Romeo wants to give him a legit shot over Cassel. I can't take another ****ing season of Cassel not even being able to throw to the back on the run on a simple wheel route. JFC........

carlos3652 · 03-18-2012, 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace

How many years worth of picks were you willing to give up?

Lets see - to move from #6 to #2 it took:

2012 #2
2013 # 1
2014 #1

To move from #11 to #2 based on what the Rams got.

2012 #2, #3
2013 #1, #2
2014 #1, #2

At minimum. And then the Rams would actually want to move out of the top 10- since they can still pick up who they wanted at #6 but cant at #11.

I wouldn't do that.

Chiefnj2 · 03-18-2012, 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian

OMG.

We didn't have the ammo to trade for RGIII! Nor, should we have tried to create it. It's too ****ing much to give up. JFC.........

Meanwhile you waste this year with Cassel and hope and pray and cross your little fingers and toes they use a 1st next year to draft a QB as good as a prospect as RGIII. Good luck with that.

TheGuardian · 03-18-2012, 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2

Meanwhile you waste this year with Cassel and hope and pray and cross your little fingers and toes they use a 1st next year to draft a QB as good as a prospect as RGIII. Good luck with that.

ACtually Quinn may win the spot if given a fair shake.

And RGIII is hardly some sure bet at all. A run around QB coming from a simplified spread offense reeks of bust.

03-17-2012, 05:16 PM
ShowtimeSBMVP Chiefs Join Date: Feb 2009 Casino cash: $3726009	Chiefs have agreed to terms with QB Brady Quinn Kansas City Chiefs‏@kcchiefsReply Retweet Favorite · Open Chiefs have agreed to terms with QB Brady Quinn - more details soon on http://kcchiefs.com #chiefs
Posts: 23,752

03-18-2012, 09:49 AM	#410
CaliforniaChief #RIPAce Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: So Cal Casino cash: $12422899	Signing Winston only makes me lament one thing: That we didn't trade the farm of draft picks away to land RG3. We still would have had some late-round picks to fill in depth where needed, and would have our franchise QB. Of all the teams making a push to give up draft picks for RG3, we were the team who could most afford to lose the picks.
Posts: 17,319

03-18-2012, 10:04 AM	#412
TheGuardian MVP Join Date: Mar 2009 Casino cash: $8315299	OMG. We didn't have the ammo to trade for RGIII! Nor, should we have tried to create it. It's too ****ing much to give up. JFC.........
Posts: 7,847

03-18-2012, 10:12 AM	#417
TheGuardian MVP Join Date: Mar 2009 Casino cash: $8315299	I'm def willing to see what happens with Quinn. He was slated to go #2 overall but fell. Sounds like Rodgers but without a good situation to be in. I just hope that the reason we went after him is because Romeo wants to give him a legit shot over Cassel. I can't take another ****ing season of Cassel not even being able to throw to the back on the run on a simple wheel route. JFC........
Posts: 7,847