Books New Harry Potter series on HBO Max

Sassy Squatch · 04-13-2023, 03:16 PM

Still in the early stages it seems but currently it's pencilled in to be a DECADE long project with 10+ seasons.

**The Franchise** · 04-13-2023, 03:23 PM

Getting in on the ground floor.

This is going to suck.

DJ's left nut · 04-13-2023, 03:33 PM

Wait - it's just a reboot? That's odd; if Rowling is involved, there's a TON of universe they could mine still.

That said, the movies kinda sucked. They were just weird and often unnecessarily so. And I will continue to insist that the actors were largely shite, especially Daniel Radcliffe.

HBO could actually do this pretty well, though I'm still a little puzzled as to why they're re-booting a property that's only like 15 years old instead of going with a sequel or spinoff. Hell, even prequels could be interesting given the amount of time that takes place between the Fantastic Beasts series and the energy they put into describing the previous rise/fall of Voldemort in the books.

Just a strange decision; seems entirely risk averse.

Sassy Squatch · 04-13-2023, 03:39 PM

Think Fantastic Beasts flopping as spectacularly as it has is why they're just going for the reboot. I'll gladly take a reboot provided they actually stay faithful to the original books, even if they do have to include all the silly retcons Rowling insists on since her stories were written when no one gave a shot.about inclusivity.

Sassy Squatch · 04-13-2023, 03:42 PM

Might be nice to see a Ron that hasn't had all of his positive personality traits stripped and given to Hermione.

tredadda · 04-13-2023, 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut

Wait - it's just a reboot? That's odd; if Rowling is involved, there's a TON of universe they could mine still.

That said, the movies kinda sucked. They were just weird and often unnecessarily so. And I will continue to insist that the actors were largely shite, especially Daniel Radcliffe.

HBO could actually do this pretty well, though I'm still a little puzzled as to why they're re-booting a property that's only like 15 years old instead of going with a sequel or spinoff. Hell, even prequels could be interesting given the amount of time that takes place between the Fantastic Beasts series and the energy they put into describing the previous rise/fall of Voldemort in the books.

Just a strange decision; seems entirely risk averse.

While she should beyond a shadow of a doubt, zero chance they take her input. She upset the mob by having "controversial" viewpoints as it was not in line with the hive mob. Doubt Warner Brothers will want to deal with that.

I am curious though, do they have to get the blessing of J.K. to make it as it is her IP or has that passed? If it still is hers then I can see them just going reboot as that stuff is already out. If she doesn't then the sky is the limit, sorta how Star Wars has it's own canon and material well beyond what Lucas ever dreamed of.

Sassy Squatch · 04-13-2023, 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda

While she should beyond a shadow of a doubt, zero chance they take her input. She upset the mob by having "controversial" viewpoints as it was not in line with the hive mob. Doubt Warner Brothers will want to deal with that.

I am curious though, do they have to get the blessing of J.K. to make it as it is her IP or has that passed? If it still is hers then I can see them just going reboot as that stuff is already out. If she doesn't then the sky is the limit, sorta how Star Wars has it's own canon and material well beyond what Lucas ever dreamed of.

No, she's still heavily involved in this. They tried to buy her out but her demands were so unrealistic they basically equated to she's not interested in giving up control. And her involvement is pretty overblown as far as it being negative. The game that recently released did huge numbers and those two Fantastic Beasts movies that flopped did so because they were absolutely trash.

Sassy Squatch · 04-13-2023, 05:30 PM

It really is ****ing bizarre just how much time she has spent retconning the story to have more representation yet she has no problem broadcasting how much of a transphobe she is on the reg.

staylor26 · 04-13-2023, 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle

It really is ****ing bizarre just how much time she has spent retconning the story to have more representation yet she has no problem broadcasting how much of a transphobe she is on the reg.

staylor26 · 04-13-2023, 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda

While she should beyond a shadow of a doubt, zero chance they take her input. She upset the mob by having "controversial" viewpoints as it was not in line with the hive mob. Doubt Warner Brothers will want to deal with that.

I am curious though, do they have to get the blessing of J.K. to make it as it is her IP or has that passed? If it still is hers then I can see them just going reboot as that stuff is already out. If she doesn't then the sky is the limit, sorta how Star Wars has it's own canon and material well beyond what Lucas ever dreamed of.

Hogwarts Legacy proved that when you make a great product and ignore the nut jobs on Twitter (and other social media platforms), they have no impact.

KC_Connection · 04-13-2023, 10:03 PM

If they did this well, there's really no reason why this couldn't be better than most of those movies. I'd tune in.

Sassy Squatch · 04-14-2023, 02:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26

Come on, bro. I know she's more of an extreme feminist than an actual transphobe, but regardless it's just strange in a business sense to continue to be so public about that with all the backlash.

BigBeauford · 04-14-2023, 06:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle

Come on, bro. I know she's more of an extreme feminist than an actual transphobe, but regardless it's just strange in a business sense to continue to be so public about that with all the backlash.

As someone who has an athletically inclined daughter, JK, pop off sis.

tredadda · 04-14-2023, 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle

No, she's still heavily involved in this. They tried to buy her out but her demands were so unrealistic they basically equated to she's not interested in giving up control. And her involvement is pretty overblown as far as it being negative. The game that recently released did huge numbers and those two Fantastic Beasts movies that flopped did so because they were absolutely trash.

That is good to know and I can't say that I blame her for not wanting to give up control. This means any new material that comes out is from her and not fan fiction.

DJ's left nut · 04-14-2023, 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda

While she should beyond a shadow of a doubt, zero chance they take her input. She upset the mob by having "controversial" viewpoints as it was not in line with the hive mob. Doubt Warner Brothers will want to deal with that.

I am curious though, do they have to get the blessing of J.K. to make it as it is her IP or has that passed? If it still is hers then I can see them just going reboot as that stuff is already out. If she doesn't then the sky is the limit, sorta how Star Wars has it's own canon and material well beyond what Lucas ever dreamed of.

She has final editorial approval of all 'world of wizarding' projects, IMO.

04-13-2023, 03:16 PM
Sassy Squatch The man you could post like. Join Date: Oct 2010 Casino cash: $2489655	New Harry Potter series on HBO Max Still in the early stages it seems but currently it's pencilled in to be a DECADE long project with 10+ seasons.
Posts: 37,853

04-13-2023, 03:23 PM	#2
The Franchise Most Valuable Villain Join Date: Dec 2006 Casino cash: $3135047	Getting in on the ground floor. This is going to suck.
Posts: 92,016

04-13-2023, 03:33 PM	#3
DJ's left nut Sauntering Vaguely Downwards Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Columbia, Mo Casino cash: $3029099	Wait - it's just a reboot? That's odd; if Rowling is involved, there's a TON of universe they could mine still. That said, the movies kinda sucked. They were just weird and often unnecessarily so. And I will continue to insist that the actors were largely shite, especially Daniel Radcliffe. HBO could actually do this pretty well, though I'm still a little puzzled as to why they're re-booting a property that's only like 15 years old instead of going with a sequel or spinoff. Hell, even prequels could be interesting given the amount of time that takes place between the Fantastic Beasts series and the energy they put into describing the previous rise/fall of Voldemort in the books. Just a strange decision; seems entirely risk averse. __________________ "If there's a god, he's laughing at us.....and our football team..." "When you look at something through rose colored glasses, all the red flags just look like flags."
Posts: 60,257

04-13-2023, 03:39 PM	#4
Sassy Squatch The man you could post like. Join Date: Oct 2010 Casino cash: $2489655	Think Fantastic Beasts flopping as spectacularly as it has is why they're just going for the reboot. I'll gladly take a reboot provided they actually stay faithful to the original books, even if they do have to include all the silly retcons Rowling insists on since her stories were written when no one gave a shot.about inclusivity.
Posts: 37,853	1 0

04-13-2023, 03:42 PM	#5
Sassy Squatch The man you could post like. Join Date: Oct 2010 Casino cash: $2489655	Might be nice to see a Ron that hasn't had all of his positive personality traits stripped and given to Hermione.
Posts: 37,853

04-13-2023, 05:30 PM	#8
Sassy Squatch The man you could post like. Join Date: Oct 2010 Casino cash: $2489655	It really is ****ing bizarre just how much time she has spent retconning the story to have more representation yet she has no problem broadcasting how much of a transphobe she is on the reg.
Posts: 37,853

04-13-2023, 10:03 PM	#11
KC_Connection Perpetual Mediocrity Join Date: Jan 2006 Casino cash: $5402783	If they did this well, there's really no reason why this couldn't be better than most of those movies. I'd tune in.
Posts: 48,810	1 0