Chiefs Better pick: Toby Gerhardt or McCluster? - Page 3

**Ming the Merciless** · 04-25-2010, 06:26 PM

Ok so Gerhardt went with the #51 (we took Arenas with #50).

We took McCkuster with #36.

So which is a better pick? Which back do you see as contributing more to the NFL?

I realize that they are different kinds of backs, so this is a difficult comparison...heck Gerhardt might even end up playing a lot of FB...

To me that makes the question more interesting!

(Poll Coming soon)

aturnis · 04-25-2010, 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pawnmower

RB stands for Running Back in the NFL you waste of oxygen.

You are an idiot. Your opening thread says you realize they are different types of BACKS! McCluster won't be a back, he will be a WR who may occasionally line up as a RB or QB. You dumb ****!

LaChapelle · 04-25-2010, 06:57 PM

I think McCluster will be more apt to throw a pick
I don't understand how tight the spiral may be
has to do with anything

**Ming the Merciless** · 04-25-2010, 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCD

Exactly...

HAHAHHAHA

wow...

BCD is Rustshack right? This is a practical joke, correct?

RustShack · 04-25-2010, 06:59 PM

I think you need to reread the question dumbass. Maybe you should reread the comments where I've said multiple times that McCluster was the better pick too.

**Ming the Merciless** · 04-25-2010, 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis

You are an idiot. Your opening thread says you realize they are different types of BACKS! McCluster won't be a back, he will be a WR who may occasionally line up as a RB or QB. You dumb ****!

You seriously want to argue about whether McCluster is RB who plays WR or a WR who plays RB...?

The question is which will be the better pick, not which will be a better RB..

WTF is happening here...Where did all the reeruns come from?

Tombstone RJ · 04-25-2010, 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990

Gerhardt will follow in the vaunted footsteps of Tommy Vardell.

Oh wow, I actually remember Tommy Vardell.

aturnis · 04-25-2010, 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pawnmower

You seriously want to argue about whether McCluster is RB who plays WR or a WR who plays RB...?

Y

What? this is my first post in this thread doucher. McCluster started his career at Ole Miss as a WR, they switched him to RB b/c he was so dynamic they wanted to get the ball in his hands more often.

We have Jamaal Charles, we don't need a dynamic RB. We need a dynamic receiver. Have you seen him play receiver?

aturnis · 04-25-2010, 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pawnmower

You seriously want to argue about whether McCluster is RB who plays WR or a WR who plays RB...?

The question is which will be the better pick, not which will be a better RB..

WTF is happening here...Where did all the reeruns come from?

Your original question:

"So which is a better pick? Which back do you see as contributing more to the NFL?

I realize that they are different kinds of backs, so this is a difficult comparison...heck Gerhardt might even end up playing a lot of FB..."

**Ming the Merciless** · 04-25-2010, 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis

We have Jamaal Charles, we don't need a dynamic RB. We need a dynamic receiver. Have you seen him play receiver?

I haven't seen him play receiver in the NFL, no.

That is why I am asking the question instead of stating a fact.

I am asking which the better PICK is....

I am NOT asking which one is a better running back.

RustShack · 04-25-2010, 07:04 PM

Hes to small to play RB in the NFL. Hes smaller than Charles. Like usual, this doucher has now idea what hes talking about and has never watched either player play.

**Ming the Merciless** · 04-25-2010, 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis

So which is a better pick? Which back do you see as contributing more to the NFL?

I realize that they are different kinds of backs, so this is a difficult comparison...heck Gerhardt might even end up playing a lot of FB...

I understand you are confused....the word back throws you off, because you have a small brain...

But the question is WHO WILL BE A BETTER PICK...

Whether or not you choose to call him a back or a receiver is meaningless.

**Ming the Merciless** · 04-25-2010, 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack

Hes to small to play RB in the NFL.

So you are saying he will never line up as a back? He will never be in the backfield?...Once again you are wrong and continue to make yourself look like a total ****ing moron.

aturnis · 04-25-2010, 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pawnmower

I haven't seen him play receiver in the NFL, no.

That is why I am asking the question instead of stating a fact.

I am asking which the better PICK is....

I am NOT asking which one is a better running back.

You're a reerun. You haven't seen him play RB in the NFL. You ****ed up, live us to it. Anyways, have you see him play WR in college, or workouts or...?

aturnis · 04-25-2010, 07:07 PM

...and the answer is YES, 10/1 McCluster will be the better pick.

RustShack · 04-25-2010, 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pawnmower

So you are saying he will never line up as a back? He will never be in the backfield?...Once again you are wrong and continue to make yourself look like a total ****ing moron.

Ronnie Brown is a awesome QB isn't he? Who do you think is a better QB.. Ronnie Brown or Matt Cassel?

View Poll Results: Who was a better pick in the 2010 NFL Draft? McCluster or Gerhardt
McCluster was a better pick	99	73.88%
Toby Gerhardt was a better pick	19	14.18%
Neither will do anything of signifigance in the NFL	13	9.70%
It will be too close to call. They will both do about the same.	3	2.24%
Voters: 134. You may not vote on this poll

04-25-2010, 06:26 PM
Ming the Merciless Emporer of Mongo Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Milky Way Casino cash: $3067556	Better pick: Toby Gerhardt or McCluster? Ok so Gerhardt went with the #51 (we took Arenas with #50). We took McCkuster with #36. So which is a better pick? Which back do you see as contributing more to the NFL? I realize that they are different kinds of backs, so this is a difficult comparison...heck Gerhardt might even end up playing a lot of FB... To me that makes the question more interesting! (Poll Coming soon)
Posts: 44,476

04-25-2010, 06:57 PM	#32
LaChapelle Banned Join Date: Mar 2009 Casino cash: $10004900	I think McCluster will be more apt to throw a pick I don't understand how tight the spiral may be has to do with anything
Posts: 8,588

04-25-2010, 06:59 PM	#34
RustShack **** That Noise Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Jack Trice Casino cash: $4806954	I think you need to reread the question dumbass. Maybe you should reread the comments where I've said multiple times that McCluster was the better pick too. __________________
Posts: 15,047

04-25-2010, 07:04 PM	#40
RustShack **** That Noise Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Jack Trice Casino cash: $4806954	Hes to small to play RB in the NFL. Hes smaller than Charles. Like usual, this doucher has now idea what hes talking about and has never watched either player play. __________________
Posts: 15,047

04-25-2010, 07:07 PM	#44
aturnis MVP Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Iowa Casino cash: $9975811	...and the answer is YES, 10/1 McCluster will be the better pick.
Posts: 13,873

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode