|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: See Question Below | |||
| Nope. Civilized people don't eat other people. |
   
|
12 | 19.67% |
| Yep. Tastes like chicken, but with a wedding ring. |
  
|
25 | 40.98% |
| My lawyer has advised me not to answer this question. |
  
|
24 | 39.34% |
| Voters: 61. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-22-2002, 07:07 PM
|
Topic Starter |
|
NFL's #1 Ermines Fan
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: My house
Casino cash: $3408491
 VARSITY
|
Cannibalism - pro or anti?
I'm working late tonight, so I thought I'd reprise my only post that was ever banned back on the old KC Star BB. It was deleted before I could get a proper vote.
Here's the scenario: You're trapped in a wagon train/plane crash/Milwaukee apartment with no sources of food whatsoever. However, a few dead fellow pioneers/soccer players/bar patrons are lying about, with expiration dates that are still good. Assume that you have a 33 percent chance of surviving until the St. Bernards arrive if you DON'T barbecue the ol' gang, and a 66 percent of surviving if you partake of Sapiens stew. What's your choice? |
|
Posts: 141,202
  |
|
|
|
Threaded Mode