Home Mail Chat Wallpapers
Go Back   ChiefsPlanet > The Lounge > Washington DC and The Holy Land

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-10-2018, 12:42 PM  
Taco John Taco John is online now
Sapere Aude
 
Taco John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Casino cash: $18037
NY Times: White women are "gender traitors"

White Women, Come Get Your People
They will defend their privilege to the death.

By Alexis Grenell
Ms. Grenell has written on gender and politics for The New York Daily News, The Washington Post and other outlets.

Oct. 6, 2018

After a confirmation process where women all but slit their wrists, letting their stories of sexual trauma run like rivers of blood through the Capitol, the Senate still voted to confirm Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. With the exception of Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, all the women in the Republican conference caved, including Senator Susan Collins of Maine, who held out until the bitter end.

These women are gender traitors, to borrow a term from the dystopian TV series “The Handmaid’s Tale.” They’ve made standing by the patriarchy a full-time job. The women who support them show up at the Capitol wearing “Women for Kavanaugh” T-shirts, but also probably tell their daughters to put on less revealing clothes when they go out.

They’re more sympathetic to Senator Orrin Hatch of Utah, who actually shooed away a crowd of women and told them to “grow up.” Or Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, whose response to a woman telling him she was raped was: “I’m sorry. Call the cops.”

These are the kind of women who think that being falsely accused of rape is almost as bad as being raped. The kind of women who agree with President Trump that “it’s a very scary time for young men in America,” which he said during a news conference on Tuesday.

But the people who scare me the most are the mothers, sisters and wives of those young men, because my stupid uterus still holds out some insane hope of solidarity.

We’re talking about white women. The same 53 percent who put their racial privilege ahead of their second-class gender status in 2016 by voting to uphold a system that values only their whiteness, just as they have for decades. Since 1952, white women have broken for Democratic presidential candidates only twice: in the 1964 and 1996 elections, according to an analysis by Jane Junn, a political scientist at the University of Southern California.

Women of color, and specifically black women, make the margin of difference for Democrats. The voting patterns of white women and white men mirror each other much more closely, and they tend to cast their ballots for Republicans. The gender gap in politics is really a color line.

That’s because white women benefit from patriarchy by trading on their whiteness to monopolize resources for mutual gain. In return they’re placed on a pedestal to be “cherished and revered,” as Speaker Paul D. Ryan has said about women, but all the while denied basic rights.

This elevated position over women of color comes at a cost, though. Consider what Kellyanne Conway, a top adviser to the president, said at a dinner last year for New York’s Conservative Party. She suggested that higher birthrates are “how I think we fight these demographic wars moving forward.” The war, of course, is with non-white people. So it seems that white women are expected to support the patriarchy by marrying within their racial group, reproducing whiteness and even minimizing violence against their own bodies.

Recently, Ms. Conway even weaponized her own alleged sexual assault in service to her boss by discouraging women from feeling empathy with Christine Blasey Ford or anger at Judge Kavanaugh.

Ms. Conway knows that a woman who steps out of line may be ridiculed by the president himself. President Trump mocked Dr. Blasey in front of a cheering crowd on Tuesday evening. Betray the patriarchy and your whiteness won’t save you.

The pedestal is a superior, if precarious, place. For white women, it’s apparently better than being “stronger together,” with the 94 percent of black women and 86 percent of Latinas who voted for Hillary Clinton.

During the 2016 presidential election, did white women really vote with their whiteness in mind? Lorrie Frasure-Yokley, a political scientist at U.C.L.A., recently measured the effect of racial identity on white women’s willingness to support Trump in 2016 and found a positive and statistically significant relationship. So white women who voted for him did so to prop up their whiteness.

In the study, white women who agreed that “many women interpret innocent remarks or acts as sexist” were 17 percent more likely to vote for a Republican candidate. They were also likely to agree that “blacks should work their way up without special favors.” To be sure, women of color aren’t inherently less sexist or even without their own racial biases. But unlike white women, they can’t use race privilege to their advantage.

This blood pact between white men and white women is at issue in the November midterms. President Trump knows it, and at that Tuesday news conference, he signaled to white women to hold the line: “The people that have complained to me about it the most about what’s happening are women. Women are very angry,” he said. “I have men that don’t like it, but I have women that are incensed at what’s going on.”

I’m sure he does “have” them; game girls will defend their privilege to the death.

But apparently that doesn’t include Ms. Murkowski anymore. Maybe it’s because she comes from a state with the nation’s highest rate of sexual violence, with a sexual assault rate three times the national average, where prosecutors just let a man evade jail time after he kidnapped a native Alaskan woman and strangled her unconscious, then masturbated over her body. Maybe.

Meanwhile, Senator Collins subjected us to a slow funeral dirge about due process and some other nonsense I couldn’t even hear through my rage headache as she announced on Friday she would vote to confirm Judge Kavanaugh. Her mostly male colleagues applauded her.

The question for white women in November is: Which one of these two women are you?

I fear we already know the answer.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/06/o...kavanaugh.html
Posts: 64,145
Taco John is obviously part of the inner Circle.Taco John is obviously part of the inner Circle.Taco John is obviously part of the inner Circle.Taco John is obviously part of the inner Circle.Taco John is obviously part of the inner Circle.Taco John is obviously part of the inner Circle.Taco John is obviously part of the inner Circle.Taco John is obviously part of the inner Circle.Taco John is obviously part of the inner Circle.Taco John is obviously part of the inner Circle.Taco John is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2018, 05:04 PM   #31
Bowser Bowser is offline
Eff an A, Cotton
 
Bowser's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: KC North
Casino cash: $230000
White guilt from a raging white liberal woman. How shocking. It is a little shocking she's aiming it towards white women not of her beliefs, though. Gotta hand it to the liberals - they really know how to convince moderates to vote conservative.

*Marxist-Jew, my bad.
Posts: 71,280
Bowser is obviously part of the inner Circle.Bowser is obviously part of the inner Circle.Bowser is obviously part of the inner Circle.Bowser is obviously part of the inner Circle.Bowser is obviously part of the inner Circle.Bowser is obviously part of the inner Circle.Bowser is obviously part of the inner Circle.Bowser is obviously part of the inner Circle.Bowser is obviously part of the inner Circle.Bowser is obviously part of the inner Circle.Bowser is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2018, 05:24 PM   #32
mlyonsd mlyonsd is offline
Supporter
 

Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Spink, SD
Casino cash: $23862
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bowser View Post
White guilt from a raging white liberal woman. How shocking. It is a little shocking she's aiming it towards white women not of her beliefs, though. Gotta hand it to the liberals - they really know how to convince moderates to vote conservative.

*Marxist-Jew, my bad.
When you have no actual ideas to fix issues your only message is to attack with make believe shit.
Posts: 31,297
mlyonsd is obviously part of the inner Circle.mlyonsd is obviously part of the inner Circle.mlyonsd is obviously part of the inner Circle.mlyonsd is obviously part of the inner Circle.mlyonsd is obviously part of the inner Circle.mlyonsd is obviously part of the inner Circle.mlyonsd is obviously part of the inner Circle.mlyonsd is obviously part of the inner Circle.mlyonsd is obviously part of the inner Circle.mlyonsd is obviously part of the inner Circle.mlyonsd is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2018, 05:24 PM   #33
Prison Bitch Prison Bitch is offline
Where's my WALL?
 
Prison Bitch's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Lees summit
Casino cash: $60258
Whenever you call yourself a "Marxist" be prepared to know lotsa Americans just don't take kindly to the word.
__________________
This latest murder in no way represents Islam.
Posts: 52,552
Prison Bitch is obviously part of the inner Circle.Prison Bitch is obviously part of the inner Circle.Prison Bitch is obviously part of the inner Circle.Prison Bitch is obviously part of the inner Circle.Prison Bitch is obviously part of the inner Circle.Prison Bitch is obviously part of the inner Circle.Prison Bitch is obviously part of the inner Circle.Prison Bitch is obviously part of the inner Circle.Prison Bitch is obviously part of the inner Circle.Prison Bitch is obviously part of the inner Circle.Prison Bitch is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2018, 05:26 PM   #34
Otter Otter is online now
Non Potestis Latere
 
Otter's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Durango, CO
Casino cash: $19382
Quote:
Originally Posted by mlyonsd View Post
When you have no actual ideas to fix issues your only message is to attack with make believe shit.
QFT
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Otter View Post
If the Chiefs manage to grab Mahomes I officially claim him as my "adopt a Chief".
Posts: 17,772
Otter is obviously part of the inner Circle.Otter is obviously part of the inner Circle.Otter is obviously part of the inner Circle.Otter is obviously part of the inner Circle.Otter is obviously part of the inner Circle.Otter is obviously part of the inner Circle.Otter is obviously part of the inner Circle.Otter is obviously part of the inner Circle.Otter is obviously part of the inner Circle.Otter is obviously part of the inner Circle.Otter is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2018, 08:09 PM   #35
WhiteWhale WhiteWhale is offline
Bring it on Ahab!
 
WhiteWhale's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2011
Location: Doo-Dah
Casino cash: $15252
Social prejudice theory in action.

It starts in universities. Defund grievance studies.
Posts: 11,002
WhiteWhale has enough rep power to blowy ou to bits.WhiteWhale has enough rep power to blowy ou to bits.WhiteWhale has enough rep power to blowy ou to bits.WhiteWhale has enough rep power to blowy ou to bits.WhiteWhale has enough rep power to blowy ou to bits.WhiteWhale has enough rep power to blowy ou to bits.WhiteWhale has enough rep power to blowy ou to bits.WhiteWhale has enough rep power to blowy ou to bits.WhiteWhale has enough rep power to blowy ou to bits.WhiteWhale has enough rep power to blowy ou to bits.WhiteWhale has enough rep power to blowy ou to bits.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2018, 08:16 PM   #36
vailpass vailpass is offline
Are U Ready For Some Football
 
vailpass's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2001
Casino cash: $24344
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhiteWhale View Post
Social prejudice theory in action.

It starts in universities. Defund grievance studies.
I looked up grievance studies praying it wasn’t a real thing. Of course it is.

This article both pleased and worried me.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opini...mn/1575219002/
__________________
These violent delights have violent ends.
Posts: 54,631
vailpass is obviously part of the inner Circle.vailpass is obviously part of the inner Circle.vailpass is obviously part of the inner Circle.vailpass is obviously part of the inner Circle.vailpass is obviously part of the inner Circle.vailpass is obviously part of the inner Circle.vailpass is obviously part of the inner Circle.vailpass is obviously part of the inner Circle.vailpass is obviously part of the inner Circle.vailpass is obviously part of the inner Circle.vailpass is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2018, 08:29 PM   #37
Carr4MVP Carr4MVP is offline
Veteran
 

Join Date: Aug 2017
Casino cash: $500
All they run on is a message of hate. When you share the viewpoint of a hammer, the entire world is a nail.
Posts: 1,734
Carr4MVP would the whole thing.Carr4MVP would the whole thing.Carr4MVP would the whole thing.Carr4MVP would the whole thing.Carr4MVP would the whole thing.Carr4MVP would the whole thing.Carr4MVP would the whole thing.Carr4MVP would the whole thing.Carr4MVP would the whole thing.Carr4MVP would the whole thing.Carr4MVP would the whole thing.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2018, 09:30 PM   #38
WhiteWhale WhiteWhale is offline
Bring it on Ahab!
 
WhiteWhale's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2011
Location: Doo-Dah
Casino cash: $15252
Quote:
Originally Posted by vailpass View Post
I looked up grievance studies praying it wasn’t a real thing. Of course it is.

This article both pleased and worried me.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opini...mn/1575219002/
Yeah, I posted about that group months ago when they had a study peer reviewed in a prominent gender studies journal. Something about the metaphorical penis? I can't recall the title. The study actually blamed global warming on dicks, and not only did it pass peer review, they were highly praised and asked to join the review board. On something they wrote that was 100% word salad nonsense.

Critical race theory. Gender studies. Social justice theory. IT's all grievance studies. I mean the majority of my posts in DC are just bashing this horse-shit and how it's taking over the left's platform. It's toxic to relationships between individuals and groups and it's peddled by the same type of insular academic know-it-allism that made eugenics and white man's burden trendy. History will not look kindly on it.
Posts: 11,002
WhiteWhale has enough rep power to blowy ou to bits.WhiteWhale has enough rep power to blowy ou to bits.WhiteWhale has enough rep power to blowy ou to bits.WhiteWhale has enough rep power to blowy ou to bits.WhiteWhale has enough rep power to blowy ou to bits.WhiteWhale has enough rep power to blowy ou to bits.WhiteWhale has enough rep power to blowy ou to bits.WhiteWhale has enough rep power to blowy ou to bits.WhiteWhale has enough rep power to blowy ou to bits.WhiteWhale has enough rep power to blowy ou to bits.WhiteWhale has enough rep power to blowy ou to bits.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2018, 09:40 PM   #39
WhiteWhale WhiteWhale is offline
Bring it on Ahab!
 
WhiteWhale's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2011
Location: Doo-Dah
Casino cash: $15252
Lol, here's the study I've posted here before.

https://www.skeptic.com/downloads/co...17.1330439.pdf

Exposing pseudo science and charlatans is a commendable endeavour. These people are awesome, and I hope they keep it up.
Posts: 11,002
WhiteWhale has enough rep power to blowy ou to bits.WhiteWhale has enough rep power to blowy ou to bits.WhiteWhale has enough rep power to blowy ou to bits.WhiteWhale has enough rep power to blowy ou to bits.WhiteWhale has enough rep power to blowy ou to bits.WhiteWhale has enough rep power to blowy ou to bits.WhiteWhale has enough rep power to blowy ou to bits.WhiteWhale has enough rep power to blowy ou to bits.WhiteWhale has enough rep power to blowy ou to bits.WhiteWhale has enough rep power to blowy ou to bits.WhiteWhale has enough rep power to blowy ou to bits.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2018, 12:27 AM   #40
T-post Tom T-post Tom is offline
Umami
 
T-post Tom's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Milk/Honey/Gazland
Casino cash: $5163
Excellent response to article in OP. WARNING: THIS VIDEO CONTAINS LOGIC, REASON & TRUTH.

__________________
Over the wintry
forest, winds howl in rage
with no leaves to blow
Posts: 13,202
T-post Tom 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.T-post Tom 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.T-post Tom 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.T-post Tom 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.T-post Tom 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.T-post Tom 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.T-post Tom 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.T-post Tom 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.T-post Tom 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.T-post Tom 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.T-post Tom 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2018, 12:47 AM   #41
T-post Tom T-post Tom is offline
Umami
 
T-post Tom's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Milk/Honey/Gazland
Casino cash: $5163
https://www.nationalreview.com/corne...s-white-women/

Alexis Grenell vs. White Women
By RAMESH PONNURU
October 10, 2018 3:04 PM

This New York Times op-ed wasn’t written for me or, it seems, for anyone who doesn’t come to it already believing that right-leaning women, especially the white ones, are “gender traitors.” And I confess that I find some of Grenell’s writing simply incomprehensible, as when she writes that “white women benefit from patriarchy by trading on their whiteness to monopolize resources for mutual gain.” Over what resources do white women supposedly get a monopoly? What do they gain besides this monopoly? How does their getting this monopoly produce a gain for the patriarchy?

Two passages in the op-ed, however, I think I understand, and they are both distortions.

The first passage concerns remarks Kellyanne Conway made at a dinner in 2017.

She suggested that higher birthrates are “how I think we fight these demographic wars moving forward.” The war, of course, is with non-white people. So it seems that white women are expected to support the patriarchy by marrying within their racial group, reproducing whiteness and even minimizing violence against their own bodies.

Grenell is drawing on a previous article she has done on this topic, which helpfully includes a recording of Conway’s passing remark. Conway was joking in a way that both complimented her host for having many children and grandchildren and suggested that conservatives should have large families to win future elections. There’s no evidence at all that she was urging white people to outbreed nonwhites.

COMMENTS
Passage number two:

During the 2016 presidential election, did white women really vote with their whiteness in mind? Lorrie Frasure-Yokley, a political scientist at U.C.L.A., recently measured the effect of racial identity on white women’s willingness to support Trump in 2016 and found a positive and statistically significant relationship. So white women who voted for him did so to prop up their whiteness.

The study does not back up this claim. It finds, among other things, that white women were more likely to vote for Trump than nonwhites even after correcting for such factors as party affiliation. It does not claim that “white women” in general had a desire to “prop up their whiteness” that explains this finding. It does not even claim that a significant number of white women had this desire.

I do not envy whoever had to fact-check this op-ed, but I’m afraid that unlucky person fell down on the job.
__________________
Over the wintry
forest, winds howl in rage
with no leaves to blow
Posts: 13,202
T-post Tom 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.T-post Tom 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.T-post Tom 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.T-post Tom 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.T-post Tom 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.T-post Tom 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.T-post Tom 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.T-post Tom 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.T-post Tom 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.T-post Tom 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.T-post Tom 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:02 PM.


This is a test for a client's site.
Fort Worth Texas Process Servers
Covering Arlington, Fort Worth, Grand Prairie and surrounding communities.
Tarrant County, Texas and Johnson County, Texas.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.