Home Mail Chat Wallpapers
Go Back   ChiefsPlanet > The Lounge > Washington DC and The Holy Land

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-24-2017, 01:21 AM  
oaklandhater oaklandhater is offline
future chiefs fans
 
oaklandhater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: oakland california
Casino cash: $9093
Bruce Bartlett The Republican Party needs to die

https://www.salon.com/2017/11/23/gop...-needs-to-die/

Bruce Bartlett

CHAUNCEY DEVEGA
11.23.2017ē9:00 AM
American democracy is in crisis, a fact that should be obvious to everyone but that too many people keep ignoring. The president of the United States, Donald Trump, does not believe in or respect basic norms of democratic governance. His words and behavior reveal a deep affinity for fascism.
Over the last few decades there has been an increase in authoritarian values among American voters, and this is especially true for Republicans and other conservatives.
The Citizens United decision defined corporate money as free speech. This undermines American democracy by allowing the most powerful business interests and the richest individuals to overrule and veto the desires of the American people.
The United States is an oligarchy. Recent research shows that the country's elected officials are most responsive to the rich, business interest groups and others with the resources to buy access.

The Republican Party uses gerrymandering and voter suppression to remain in power. It has ceased to believe in any form of compromise or negotiation with Democrats or liberals. This has made consensus politics and a healthy, responsive, functioning government all but impossible.

Public faith in basic social institutions is declining and the American public, broadly speaking, lacks civic literacy. This is a recipe for the American authoritarianism and demagoguery embodied by Trump and the Republican Party.
Journalists, the so-called Fourth Estate, were supposed to sound the alarm about these developments. Instead, the corporate news media has all too often defaulted to a naÔve belief that America's democratic institutions are healthy and strong, thus able to resist any challenge or corruption. Instead of being truth-tellers who balance power by informing the public so the latter can make good decisions, the corporate media empowered Donald Trump and the Republican Party through a slavish devotion to "fairness" and "balance" and a "both sides do it" narrative.
How has the truth been assaulted by Donald Trump and the Republican Party? What role did Trump's incessant lies and his talking points about "fake news" play in his election? How does the myth of the "liberal media" empower the American right? Is there any space for a liberal or centrist alternative to Fox News and the broader right-wing disinformation-propaganda machine? Can the Republican Party in its present form be saved? Does the Trump campaign's alleged collusion with Russia during the 2016 presidential election reflect a larger cultural and political problem?

In an effort to answer these questions I recently spoke with Bruce Bartlett. He was a former White House adviser under President Ronald Reagan and also served under President George H.W. Bush. Bartlett is a regular contributor to the New York Times and has appeared on CNN, MSNBC and other major news networks. He is the author of the new book "The Truth Matters: A Citizen's Guide to Separating Facts From Lies and Stopping Fake News in Its Tracks."
A longer version of this conversation can be heard on my podcast, which is available on Salonís Featured Audio page.

How do you think Donald Trump was able to get elected?
I admit that I was dismayed by the election results. As I thought about how it happened, it just seemed to me that a big part of the story is the media. The media is broken and has adopted certain conventions that I think have normalized Trumpís craziness as well as the craziness of the Republican Party.
Why do you think the mainstream news media was so reluctant to directly confront and expose Trump's lies?

When the mainstream media began to downsize to cope with the loss of revenue from advertising and subscribers, the first thing they did was lay off their most senior reporters. They were able to save a lot of money that way. The problem is that a lot of journalistic training takes place informally in the newsroom, where young reporters learn from the old veterans who have been around for a long time. One of the things that you learn in that way that can't be taught in the university is how to tell when somebody is lying.
There is also ďhe said, she saidĒ journalism, where in order to gain access to a source that can now go around the traditional news media through Twitter and other methods you have to give them whatever they want.
Your source has to be convinced that youíre going to be good to them and get their message out the way they want it to be gotten out, so reporters are now almost forced to be stenographers. Now, obviously the reporters can't just do that, but neither can they inject themselves into the story and say, ďOK, hereís what my source inside the campaign is saying but my reporting and examination of the facts says this is all bullshit, that itís a lie." They can't do that because then they burn their source, the source will never talk to them again if they tell the truth.

Instead, they go to the Clinton campaign and say, ďWhat do you think about this statement that was just given to me by somebody in the Trump campaign?Ē They will say whatever it is they say and the reporter will take that down. ďTrump said this, Clinton said that,Ē and thatís all you get. You donít get the follow-up, you donít get the reporting, the analysis, the fact-checking that would tell you which one is right and which one is wrong.
Conservatives have also created a cudgel with the myth of the "liberal news media." It intimidates the press into being subservient to their agenda in the interest of "fairness" and "balance."

Yes, but I also think that organizations like the New York Times bend over much too far backwards. I donít know why they bother. Conservatives donít read the New York Times; theyíre not going to lose any subscribers by telling the truth.
If you were to pick a moment when the media landscape changed in a way that helped to birth Donald Trump's presidency, what would it be?

I think there are several inflection points. I would go back to 1969 as the beginning, because that was the year that Spiro Agnew gave his famous speech attacking the media. It set the tone for everything conservatives have thought about the media ever since, which is that it is "elitist," opposed to their values, and hopelessly liberal. It was nonsense then and itís certainly nonsense now.

As a consequence, conservatives I think have long drifted away from the mainstream media and sought out alternative media. Even before talk radio, it was very common that conservatives would get much of their news from newsletters and small magazines like Human Events. The fact that conservatives had an alternative media network actually put them in a good position once the mainstream media began to decline.

I think liberals, by contrast, have always been very happy with the mainstream media. I think Democrats really depended on the New York Times to come up with good ideas for policies and hearings and so on. Then came the ending of the Fairness Doctrine, which immediately gave rise to Rush Limbaugh and others of his ilk. I think the next inflection point was of course the Republican takeover of Congress [in 1994] and then the creation of Fox News very shortly thereafter.

Why do you think there has not been a successful counter to right-wing talk radio, and right-wing media more generally, from liberals and centrists?
Well I think the simple answer is that liberals and centrists are perfectly content with the mainstream media. Theyíre very happy with the New York Times and the Washington Post exactly as they are; theyíre happy with ABC, CBS, NBC and NPR. People forget that NPR is essentially liberal talk radio, and thatís one reason why a more explicitly liberal type of talk radio couldnít compete. NPR, like Limbaugh, is very, very good at what it does. I think thatís a big part of the problem.

And of course liberals never had a chip on their shoulder -- they never felt that the media was biased against them and they never felt that their ideas were ridiculed the way Republicans and conservatives have always believed. The soil is simply not conducive to something that would be more explicitly liberal.

Back in the 1960s, the political scientist and historian Richard Hofstadter famously wrote about the power that anti-intellectualism and the "paranoid style," i.e., conspiracy theories, held over American conservatives. Decades later, fringe narratives are now the mainstream in American conservative thought and media. This is extremely dangerous for democracy. How can we find solutions to problems when we can't agree on the nature of empirical reality?

I think youíve touched on one of the most disturbing aspects of the Fox News phenomenon, which is that it normalizes and mainstreams a lot of nutty crackpot conspiracy crap that would otherwise stay in the fever swamps of the far right.
I have an idea, and tell me if you think it is viable. The so-called experts and other talking heads who appear on the TV news should have their qualifications, professional relationships (i.e., who is paying them) and political affiliations listed under their names. This would help the public to understand the agenda at work. Do you think that would actually help our public discourse?

Well, I donít know if it would help, but I do think it is genuinely desirable. There is no reason why that information could not at a minimum be posted online. You reminded me of another moment that changed my thinking about how this all operates. Many years ago when cable news became ubiquitous, I was working for a conservative think tank and I was often invited to be a talking head on various networks.

In the very early years I would usually be on with somebody like myself -- for example, a senior fellow at a liberal think tank. The problem from the point of view of producers was there were no fireworks because we respected each other. We understood what the data was, we understood what the literature was, our differences were not that great and we often agreed with each other. Producers hated this.

I noticed after a few years that I was no longer being put on against a peer but instead people that I had no idea who they were. For example they were a "Democratic consultant" or a "liberal activist" -- very vague terms. I'd never heard of these people and in fact when I would go online to look them up I couldnít find anything. It was as if they literally didnít exist. Another problem was that these people I was up against clearly had gotten media training. All the networks have the same attitude about talking heads, which is that they want somebody whoíll give the rote repetition of the Republican line of the day and someone else whoíll give the rote repetition of the Democratic line of the day. There will be absolutely zero agreement and preferably theyíll yell at each other and scream and weíll have fireworks, which are good for ratings.

With your many years of experience in Washington, with the news media, and now your new book on "fake news," how much does the Russia scandal remind you of Watergate? Or do you think what Robert Mueller uncovers about Donald Trump and his associates will be even worse?
I hope not. But I am prepared for it. Trump is clearly the most incompetent president weíve ever had in our lives. Richard Nixon may well have been the smartest. Nixon was cursed by paranoia, and I think Trump is as well. The question then becomes: Is this incompetence a good thing or a bad thing? Is it more dangerous to have a paranoid incompetent than it was to have a highly intelligent paranoid person as president? I donít think we can tell. When I hear Trump talk, I sometimes have this feeling that he literally had no idea what was going on in his own campaign. He can deny these allegations and be perfectly truthful in his own mind because nobody told him.

Heís a useful idiot.
Thatís one way of describing him. It may be that he is the person who will be the most shocked when the truth finally comes out. He may say, ďOh my God, I had no idea my son-in-law was doing such stupid things.Ē
To watch the national and global calamity that is Trump's presidency in real time is unbelievable. If someone had told me 10 years ago that the country would be in such a crisis I would have said they were crazy. Do you feel the same way, or did you see it coming given how extreme the Republican Party has become over the last few decades?
Well, itís vastly worse than I could possibly have imagined. I had this naÔve idea that Trump had been a successful businessman because he had competent staff. I just assumed that Trump's company had an army of lawyers and vice presidents with MBAs from Harvard Business School who went around like the guy behind the elephant in the parade with a broom and a shovel cleaning up his messes and fixing the contracts and getting the deals done properly that their boss was too incompetent to do himself. I just assumed that once he got into the White House weíd find these people would just come in and run things. I was shocked that that wasnít the case. There was nobody.

If someone were to ask you why Trumpís voters backed him, how would you answer?
Thatís the $64,000 question. Certainly a big part of it was voter fatigue. As far as the Democrats are concerned it has been true since at least the post-World War II era that each party gets eight years -- and only eight years. There is only one exception to that rule and it was George H.W. Bush. It was probably in the cards that whoever got the Republican nomination was in a much better position to win than was generally assumed. Of course, Hillary Clinton turned out to be a historically poor candidate not just in a general way but also technically. From what Iíve read about her campaign, Hillary didnít do statewide polling in the last couple of weeks before the election and really had no idea what was going on in critical battleground states.

The Comey letter [to Congress in late October] was horribly timed of course. I think thereís been this idea in American politics for a very long time that outsiders have some kind of special gift as compared to professional politicians. Moreover, Republicans just love the idea of bringing in a businessman to run the government. What they donít realize is what you end up with is somebody who has absolutely no training for the job. The most successful presidents in recent memory were men with massive amounts of skill, namely [Lyndon B.] Johnson and Nixon. They had been in government their whole lives.
How did todayís Republican Party, in your estimation, become the way it is? Can it be saved?
The Republican Party needs to die. Itís already a zombie. Itís brain dead.
Posts: 14,989
oaklandhater 's adopt a chief was Sabby Piscitellioaklandhater 's adopt a chief was Sabby Piscitellioaklandhater 's adopt a chief was Sabby Piscitellioaklandhater 's adopt a chief was Sabby Piscitellioaklandhater 's adopt a chief was Sabby Piscitellioaklandhater 's adopt a chief was Sabby Piscitellioaklandhater 's adopt a chief was Sabby Piscitellioaklandhater 's adopt a chief was Sabby Piscitellioaklandhater 's adopt a chief was Sabby Piscitellioaklandhater 's adopt a chief was Sabby Piscitellioaklandhater 's adopt a chief was Sabby Piscitelli
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2017, 04:16 PM   #91
Pueblo Chieftan Pueblo Chieftan is online now
Veteran
 
Pueblo Chieftan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Pueblo,CO
Casino cash: $500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prison Bitch View Post
You all went to bat for The Clintons, flat out lying about their opponents
If Bush Sr had let Casper Weinberger go on trial and blown the lid off Iran/Contra, he would have been impeached. So he brought his Mena drug partner (Bill Clinton) in to be President. Now President Trump is caught up in a TURF WAR between the Clinton Crime Family (Comey) and the Bush Crime Family (Mueller) and, instead of the Clinton's taking over the Bush/Clinton Crime Family with Hillary (Comey) like they planned, they've had to RE-UNITE against TRUMP using Mueller/Comey to save the Bush/Clinton crime family and try to stop President Trump from draining their ďcriminalĒ swamp. Itís just that simple.
Posts: 2,313
Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2017, 04:17 PM   #92
oaklandhater oaklandhater is offline
future chiefs fans
 
oaklandhater's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: oakland california
Casino cash: $9093
Quote:
Originally Posted by LaDexter View Post
Barack Obama was a bigot, a liar, a kleptocrat, and a traitor.

He was nothing in the ballpark of the word "conservative."
he would be considered conservative in the EU/UK.

It's a sad state in America that we don't have a true left party.
Posts: 14,989
oaklandhater 's adopt a chief was Sabby Piscitellioaklandhater 's adopt a chief was Sabby Piscitellioaklandhater 's adopt a chief was Sabby Piscitellioaklandhater 's adopt a chief was Sabby Piscitellioaklandhater 's adopt a chief was Sabby Piscitellioaklandhater 's adopt a chief was Sabby Piscitellioaklandhater 's adopt a chief was Sabby Piscitellioaklandhater 's adopt a chief was Sabby Piscitellioaklandhater 's adopt a chief was Sabby Piscitellioaklandhater 's adopt a chief was Sabby Piscitellioaklandhater 's adopt a chief was Sabby Piscitelli
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2017, 04:17 PM   #93
LaDexter LaDexter is offline
Starter
 

Join Date: Jun 2016
Casino cash: $500
The Iran/Contra deal was good for the US.

The only reason it got attention was that ISRAEL didn't like it.
Posts: 722
LaDexter < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.LaDexter < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.LaDexter < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.LaDexter < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.LaDexter < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.LaDexter < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.LaDexter < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.LaDexter < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.LaDexter < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.LaDexter < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.LaDexter < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2017, 04:18 PM   #94
LaDexter LaDexter is offline
Starter
 

Join Date: Jun 2016
Casino cash: $500
"It's a sad state in America that we don't have a true left party."


We have two "completely sold out to the ISRAEL Lobby" parties... and small parties.
Posts: 722
LaDexter < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.LaDexter < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.LaDexter < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.LaDexter < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.LaDexter < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.LaDexter < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.LaDexter < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.LaDexter < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.LaDexter < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.LaDexter < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.LaDexter < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2017, 04:48 PM   #95
Pueblo Chieftan Pueblo Chieftan is online now
Veteran
 
Pueblo Chieftan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Pueblo,CO
Casino cash: $500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LaDexter View Post
Barack Obama was a bigot, a liar, a kleptocrat, and a traitor.

He was nothing in the ballpark of the word "conservative."
I agree except I would substitute the term conservative for radical.
Posts: 2,313
Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2017, 05:22 PM   #96
Over Yonder Over Yonder is offline
Veteran
 
Over Yonder's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: North Missouri
Casino cash: $500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pueblo Chieftan View Post
Barack Obama is a conservative.


Be honest, at some point in your life you nearly overdosed on lead based paint.

__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baby Lee View Post
Few things Democrats profess to love more than a failed Republican.

From Ford and Papa Bush down through Dole and Kemp, McCain and Romney, they universally exclaim 'why can't more be like THEM!!'
Posts: 2,328
Over Yonder Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.Over Yonder Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.Over Yonder Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.Over Yonder Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.Over Yonder Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.Over Yonder Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.Over Yonder Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.Over Yonder Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.Over Yonder Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.Over Yonder Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.Over Yonder Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2017, 05:46 PM   #97
Pueblo Chieftan Pueblo Chieftan is online now
Veteran
 
Pueblo Chieftan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Pueblo,CO
Casino cash: $500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Over Yonder View Post


Be honest, at some point in your life you nearly overdosed on lead based paint.

Who? Me? I don't understand. Do you think so O'er Yonder? you should look to anarchist writings on transparency.

After reading books on Anarchism' philosophy and history, it is my understanding that Anarchists don't advice, exchange passwords or collude with administrations linked to white supremacists and the KKK like Donald Trump's.

It seems to me that Anarchists' intent is more about building a horizontal, democratic society with a more consensual, leaderless government than "destroying everything."

It will continue while WE continue to vote for the two corrupt, corporate-funded parties. A more correct term for our leadership is psychopathocracy. A system ruled by psychopaths.

This goes far beyond (Duopoly) party. This is pathological.

That is my assessment.
Posts: 2,313
Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2017, 06:06 PM   #98
Over Yonder Over Yonder is offline
Veteran
 
Over Yonder's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: North Missouri
Casino cash: $500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pueblo Chieftan View Post
Who? Me? I don't understand. Do you think so O'er Yonder? you should look to anarchist writings on transparency.

After reading books on Anarchism' philosophy and history, it is my understanding that Anarchists don't advice, exchange passwords or collude with administrations linked to white supremacists and the KKK like Donald Trump's.

It seems to me that Anarchists' intent is more about building a horizontal, democratic society with a more consensual, leaderless government than "destroying everything."

It will continue while WE continue to vote for the two corrupt, corporate-funded parties. A more correct term for our leadership is psychopathocracy. A system ruled by psychopaths.

This goes far beyond (Duopoly) party. This is pathological.

That is my assessment.
I know little about anarchy and I don't intend on reading up or learning about it. But that has nothing to do with thinking Hussein is a conservative. I think Obummer has shoved this nation closer to socialism in his 8 short years than any other president with the possible exception of FDR.

The little bit I do know about it leads me to believe conservatives are generally on the other end of the spectrum. Libbys tend to be the let everybody do whatever they want as long as nobody's feelings get hurt.

IE, conservs tend to be authoritarian and libs tend to be anarchist. I'm really bending and stretching here because this is one weird universe you are trying to build here so I am probably making as much sense as you are
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baby Lee View Post
Few things Democrats profess to love more than a failed Republican.

From Ford and Papa Bush down through Dole and Kemp, McCain and Romney, they universally exclaim 'why can't more be like THEM!!'
Posts: 2,328
Over Yonder Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.Over Yonder Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.Over Yonder Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.Over Yonder Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.Over Yonder Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.Over Yonder Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.Over Yonder Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.Over Yonder Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.Over Yonder Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.Over Yonder Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.Over Yonder Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2017, 06:50 PM   #99
Pueblo Chieftan Pueblo Chieftan is online now
Veteran
 
Pueblo Chieftan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Pueblo,CO
Casino cash: $500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Over Yonder View Post
I know little about anarchy and I don't intend on reading up or learning about it. But that has nothing to do with thinking Hussein is a conservative. I think Obummer has shoved this nation closer to socialism in his 8 short years than any other president with the possible exception of FDR.

The little bit I do know about it leads me to believe conservatives are generally on the other end of the spectrum. Libbys tend to be the let everybody do whatever they want as long as nobody's feelings get hurt.

IE, conservs tend to be authoritarian and libs tend to be anarchist. I'm really bending and stretching here because this is one weird universe you are trying to build here so I am probably making as much sense as you are
I agree, but I think you're missing the point. That being that it is more a matter of a bunch of global industrialists working hand in hand with governments in a variety of nations. And that is what the most pressing problems arise from.

There are so many cross ties between Russia, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, American leadership (political and business) that unraveling who did what and who benefited and who paid whom for favors?

Is going to take time.

This is what happens when you take people with global business ties with allegiance to Money, mix them up in a room, and then put them in charge of governments.

Time to destroy the Trump crime family. Time to destroy all corrupt politicians and their corporate overlords.
Posts: 2,313
Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2017, 07:02 PM   #100
Over Yonder Over Yonder is offline
Veteran
 
Over Yonder's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: North Missouri
Casino cash: $500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pueblo Chieftan View Post
I agree, but I think you're missing the point. That being that it is more a matter of a bunch of global industrialists working hand in hand with governments in a variety of nations. And that is what the most pressing problems arise from.

There are so many cross ties between Russia, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, American leadership (political and business) that unraveling who did what and who benefited and who paid whom for favors?

Is going to take time.

This is what happens when you take people with global business ties with allegiance to Money, mix them up in a room, and then put them in charge of governments.

Time to destroy the Trump crime family. Time to destroy all corrupt politicians and their corporate overlords.
Yea, I did miss your point. The Obummer is a conservative nonsense aside, I agree with most of what you posted there. But you are aware that is was Clinton (Bill) that originally put those businessmen, politicians, shakers and what-not in the same room, correct? NAFTA

Why exactly are we blaming Trump?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baby Lee View Post
Few things Democrats profess to love more than a failed Republican.

From Ford and Papa Bush down through Dole and Kemp, McCain and Romney, they universally exclaim 'why can't more be like THEM!!'
Posts: 2,328
Over Yonder Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.Over Yonder Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.Over Yonder Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.Over Yonder Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.Over Yonder Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.Over Yonder Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.Over Yonder Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.Over Yonder Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.Over Yonder Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.Over Yonder Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.Over Yonder Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2017, 09:05 PM   #101
Pueblo Chieftan Pueblo Chieftan is online now
Veteran
 
Pueblo Chieftan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Pueblo,CO
Casino cash: $500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Over Yonder View Post
Yea, I did miss your point. The Obummer is a conservative nonsense aside, I agree with most of what you posted there. But you are aware that is was Clinton (Bill) that originally put those businessmen, politicians, shakers and what-not in the same room, correct? NAFTA

Why exactly are we blaming Trump?
It's actually free-from-rules trade. The U.S. has endured 34 years of "free" trade policies, supported by both parties. In 1979, Ronald Reagan started the idea of a North American Union, which led to NAFTA

In 1992, President George H.W. Bush ceremonially signed NAFTA, along with Mexican President Salinas and Canadian Prime Minister Mulroney. His administration conducted the NAFTA negotiations.

In 1993, President Clinton signed NAFTA after it was ratified.

In 2004, the Bush administration (N. Gregory Mankiw) stated that the offshoring of blue-colla*r AND white-colla*r jobs would enrich the U.S.

In 2011, the Obama administration selected Jeff "I'm a nut on China" Immelt, GE's CEO, a high priest of the offshoring cult, to be the chairman of the administration's jobs commission , which never had a meeting. It was disbanded on January 31, 2013, when its charter expired.

In 2012, President Obama AND Mitt Romney both supported the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement, described by the Congressional Progressive Caucus as NAFTA on steroids.

I think Reagan and his group were the first to understand the potential of pushing Economic Imperialism wide scale. He sold a temporary Shangri-la to the ruling elite and they bought it.

I blame Reagan most of all because he sold the failed idea of "free" market, deregulation and privatization to millions with his charm. And then the Republican Bill Clinton put it on steroids with the "free trade" agreements. Bush the war criminal effed up so much stuff and finally turned all the wealth over to the Wall Street Banksters and kingpins.

Its funny how we have a name.. reagan, bush, obama.. etc.. to me the real truth lies behind the curtain.. these names are faces of the ceo of the us.. short term relatively.. nonetheless.. you want to blame anyone...it is simple... follow the $.

As far as I am concerned the Democrats stopped being real Democrats after FDR and especially after JFK. They are back stabbers with flowery speeches, while the Republicans slap us in the face. Interestingly, and especially on socioeconomic policies, LBJ was a real lefty, understanding the most basic point about the US: A big middle class is necessary to maintain the economy, which is necessary to save the country.

This can't be done without shoring up the poor, putting rungs on the ladder out of poverty (you can't grow a middle class out of thin air). Such historic conservatives as Eisenhower understood the need for a legitimate social safety net AND for enforcing regulations on corporate powers.

Most recommended check out the Venus Project. A world with no money, no poverty, no politics is possible. You just have to get past the propaganda of our current culture. In my opinion, this could be the paradigm shift humanity needs to free ourselves from this stupid game we have been playing for centuries.

http://www.thevenusproject.com
Posts: 2,313
Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Pueblo Chieftan < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:03 PM.


This is a test for a client's site.
Fort Worth Texas Process Servers
Covering Arlington, Fort Worth, Grand Prairie and surrounding communities.
Tarrant County, Texas and Johnson County, Texas.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.