Other Sports Tiger Woods - Page 9

Hamwallet · 03-11-2018, 04:13 PM

Anyone else watch golf for the first time in a long time today? He seems to be getting back to form. He was right in it today, next week is Bay Hill, that dude lived on the course for a LONG time.

KC_Connection · 04-08-2018, 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by otherstar

It was exceptional, but still not at the same level as Jack Nicklaus....and Nicklaus had MUCH tougher competition.

I don't want to diminish Jack Nicklaus' level of dominance which was similar, but the competition in Nicklaus' era wasn't even close to as good as it was in Tiger's. Nowhere near the same kind of depth/talent pool.

**srvy** · 04-08-2018, 11:05 PM

Surely you were drunk when you posted this

**srvy** · 04-08-2018, 11:22 PM

The shortlist of greats of the game Nicklaus played with Gary Player (nine majors), Tom Watson (eight), Arnold Palmer (seven), Lee Trevino (six) and Seve Ballesteros (five).

CoMoChief · 04-09-2018, 01:07 AM

It was nice to see Tiger play well the last rd.

When Tiger golfs, the world watches. Plain n simple.

Garcia Bronco · 04-09-2018, 05:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection

I don't want to diminish Jack Nicklaus' level of dominance which was similar, but the competition in Nicklaus' era wasn't even close to as good as it was in Tiger's. Nowhere near the same kind of depth/talent pool.

what?...okay.

oldman · 04-09-2018, 07:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by srvy

The shortlist of greats of the game Nicklaus played with Gary Player (nine majors), Tom Watson (eight), Arnold Palmer (seven), Lee Trevino (six) and Seve Ballesteros (five).

Yep, put Woods in with that group and he wouldn't have won so easily. I'm not saying he isn't great, but no one matches Jack.

Kman34 · 04-09-2018, 07:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oldman

Yep, put Woods in with that group and he wouldn't have won so easily. I'm not saying he isn't great, but no one matches Jack.

It would be interesting to see Tiger and Jack play each other in their prime using the same equipment... either with today’s technology or yesterday’s...

**srvy** · 04-09-2018, 07:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oldman

Yep, put Woods in with that group and he wouldn't have won so easily. I'm not saying he isn't great, but no one matches Jack.

Yep and I didnt even include Raymond Floyd, Hale Irwin and Johhny Miller trying to show a little Mercy.

**srvy** · 04-09-2018, 08:20 AM

Another thing not mentioned here that needs noted Jack played the prime of his career without the aid of technological advance in clubs and balls. The huge metal woods and graphite drivers and fairway woods were in his twilight years. Yet as a young phenom he was driving 300 yards and hitting mid irons on his second to par 5's. Tiger was the greatist of his generation and and one of the greatest ever but Jack is the GOAT far and away.

**ChiTown** · 04-09-2018, 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection

I don't want to diminish Jack Nicklaus' level of dominance which was similar, but the competition in Nicklaus' era wasn't even close to as good as it was in Tiger's. Nowhere near the same kind of depth/talent pool.

JFC, just stop

KC_Connection · 04-09-2018, 09:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco

what?...okay.

How is this in any way controversial? The sport and its talent pool have evolved immensely since the Nicklaus era. It continues to. Many more countries play the sport and develop elite athletes than they used to in the 60s/70s.

KC_Connection · 04-09-2018, 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by srvy

The shortlist of greats of the game Nicklaus played with Gary Player (nine majors), Tom Watson (eight), Arnold Palmer (seven), Lee Trevino (six) and Seve Ballesteros (five).

That’s true but how good was the 20th ranked golfer then? The 40th? The 100th?

That’s where the difference in the eras lies. There are always great golfers in any era, but the standard to even play at this level has risen significantly as more countries/athletes have begun playing the sport.

Garcia Bronco · 04-09-2018, 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection

How is this in any way controversial? The sport and its talent pool have evolved immensely since the Nicklaus era. It continues to. Many more countries play the sport and develop elite athletes than they used to in the 60s/70s.

Tiger in his prime did not ever face the consistent great talent Jack had to face.

Look both guys had incredible careers, but if TW is a 10 then Jack is a 10.2.

**fan4ever** · 04-09-2018, 10:48 AM

https://ftw.usatoday.com/2014/08/jac...n-bubba-watson

I wonder how todays pros would have done with Jack's equipment...340 yard drive with a persimmon head and wound ball...1963

BWillie · 04-09-2018, 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco

Tiger in his prime did not ever face the consistent great talent Jack had to face.

Look both guys had incredible careers, but if TW is a 10 then Jack is a 10.2.

I'd argue that neither of them did. Tiger created a whole new talent pool to golf. He increased popularity by at least 2x. Those kids Tiger brought to golf? Well they are in their prime now.

Tiger doesn't have to beat Mark O'Meara, Fuzzy Zoeller and David Duval anymore. He has to beat Dustin Johnson, Jordan Speith, Rory McIlroy, Ricky Fowler, Bubba Watson etc. That is the best talent pool in golf's history probably. It's just math. How many people played golf 60 years ago? How many played golf 30 years ago? How many play now? As the amount of people that play golf increases, the competition gets much more difficult.

03-11-2018, 04:13 PM
Hamwallet Veteran Join Date: Sep 2013 Location: Central Florida Casino cash: $1469080	Tiger Woods Anyone else watch golf for the first time in a long time today? He seems to be getting back to form. He was right in it today, next week is Bay Hill, that dude lived on the course for a LONG time.
Posts: 3,711

04-08-2018, 11:05 PM	#122
srvy Fight, build, win! Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: KC Casino cash: $1761250	Surely you were drunk when you posted this __________________ "The victim stance is a powerful one. The victim is always morally right, neither responsible nor accountable, and forever entitled to sympathy."
Posts: 24,344

04-08-2018, 11:22 PM	#123
srvy Fight, build, win! Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: KC Casino cash: $1761250	The shortlist of greats of the game Nicklaus played with Gary Player (nine majors), Tom Watson (eight), Arnold Palmer (seven), Lee Trevino (six) and Seve Ballesteros (five). __________________ "The victim stance is a powerful one. The victim is always morally right, neither responsible nor accountable, and forever entitled to sympathy."
Posts: 24,344

04-09-2018, 01:07 AM	#124
CoMoChief Mahomes Dynasty Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Parts Unknown Casino cash: $8052254	It was nice to see Tiger play well the last rd. When Tiger golfs, the world watches. Plain n simple. __________________
Posts: 39,155

04-09-2018, 08:20 AM	#129
srvy Fight, build, win! Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: KC Casino cash: $1761250	Another thing not mentioned here that needs noted Jack played the prime of his career without the aid of technological advance in clubs and balls. The huge metal woods and graphite drivers and fairway woods were in his twilight years. Yet as a young phenom he was driving 300 yards and hitting mid irons on his second to par 5's. Tiger was the greatist of his generation and and one of the greatest ever but Jack is the GOAT far and away. __________________ "The victim stance is a powerful one. The victim is always morally right, neither responsible nor accountable, and forever entitled to sympathy."
Posts: 24,344

04-09-2018, 10:48 AM	#134
fan4ever Supporter Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Scottsdale, AZ Casino cash: $5834389	https://ftw.usatoday.com/2014/08/jac...n-bubba-watson I wonder how todays pros would have done with Jack's equipment...340 yard drive with a persimmon head and wound ball...1963 __________________ "You will never reach your destination if you stop and throw rocks at every dog that barks" - Winston Churchill
Posts: 9,335