|
09-19-2017, 01:08 PM | ||
__
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Springpatch
Casino cash: $4403447
|
The most shocking headline you'll see all year.
http://deadspin.com/los-angeles-does...ers-1818503650
Los Angeles Doesn't Care About The Chargers Barry Petchesky Yesterday 9:07am Sunday saw the return of the Los Angeles Chargers, their first home game since 1960, and no one’s very excited about it. New and relocated teams usually get a first-year attendance bump, just from the novelty. The Chargers are a good team with an offense that’s fun to watch. Their temporary home, a soccer-specific stadium, is intimate and unique. There are plenty of reasons the Chargers might draw a good crowd. None of those reasons, apparently, are enough to overcome the hard realties of deep, deep disinterest:
A stadium that seats 27,000 couldn’t sell out, drawing an officially (generously) announced crowd of 25,381 for a 19-17 loss to the Dolphins. Making that attendance figure even sadder is that half of paying fans weren’t there to see the Chargers. “There were a lot of Miami fans out there,” Melvin Gordon said. “I think it was around 50-50.” Including, perhaps, the person in charge of setting off the cannon after Chargers scores. Listen for the boom as Younghoe Koo missed a 44-yarder that would’ve won the game:
You’ll also hear a lot of cheers in that video. Those are the Dolphins fans, and they confused Philip Rivers all afternoon: Quote:
Let’s be clear: None of this is an indictment of those Chargers fans that exist or of Angelenos. You’re under no obligations to go to games, and considering how much better television is than the live NFL experience, the incentives are already slim. The NFL is a business, and if people aren’t consuming a product, that’s a sign of a failure of the company to offer a product people want to consume. And, potentially, a fatal misread of the market. Could it be possible, after the NFL spent decades using Los Angeles as a threat to strong-arm cities into building stadiums to keep their teams, that Los Angeles didn’t actually want its own team, let alone two? It’s still very early, but:
|
|
Posts: 59,260
|
09-21-2017, 10:30 AM | #91 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jul 2009
Casino cash: $2774064
|
Quote:
The chargers just never made sense. I kind of agree with DJ that Canada makes sense |
|
Posts: 81,217
|
09-21-2017, 10:48 AM | #92 |
Needs more middle fingers
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Casino cash: $4304563
|
Toronto makes sense for the Bills. Chargers not so much unless they completely re-brand.
__________________
It's O'side or No side, baby. |
Posts: 64,207
|
09-21-2017, 10:50 AM | #93 |
"You like to drink?"
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: "I like to drink."
Casino cash: $3256869
|
Too bad Canada doesn't care about the NFL.
__________________
Chiefs 2016 Opponents: Home: JAX, TEN, NO, TB, NYJ. Away: HOU, IND, ATL, CAR, PIT Chiefs 2017 Opponents: Home: BUF, MIA, PHI, WSH, AFC North. Away: NE, NYJ, NYG, DAL, AFC South |
Posts: 42,687
|
09-21-2017, 11:06 AM | #94 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jul 2009
Casino cash: $2774064
|
|
Posts: 81,217
|
09-21-2017, 11:32 AM | #95 | |
Beyond the Rapids
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Langley, VA
Casino cash: $-370000
|
Quote:
Are people going to battle their way across LA through traffic and everything else, to pay prices to attend games that will surely be above Jerry's World prices, because there's a campus around it which hosts the NFL network? And this will need to support two teams? I mean, call me crazy I suppose, but it seems like franchises are powered by fans who feel loyalty to a football team and support it through thick and thin. Not because the team is good but because it's a passion. Are people going to be passionate about the "gameday experience"? Are they going to keep coming back over and over to pay (exorbitant prices) at the great bars and restaurants in the stadium? Does the League think the fan base has infinite resources and will pay for anything they put out? Any add on, any upsell or upcharge? Do they think rank and file fans care about uber-luxury experiences or do they just want to see good football at a price they think is fair? I don't think history is going to bear this out. I don't think amenities drive attendance, football does. I don't think "gameday experience' means anything when the team is terrible or when the city has no attachment to it. I don't think fans cheer for owners like Spanos or Kroenke who regard the fan base with contempt. I don't think these teams are going to have an easy time building attachment from football fans in the city, many of whom already have a team. Maybe I am wrong - maybe just being in LA is enough to keep a team profitable. Maybe they will suck enough corporate dollars out of the city and sell enough suits and advertising that the gate receipts won't matter that much. You watch LA Kings games on TV and unless the team is near the top of the conference, the lower level looks about 2/3 full. Who knows. I just don't buy into the idea that this "district" is going to drive attendance, especially for two teams, because the football fans that keep franchises going don't want to go to Disneyland. They just want to watch football. |
|
Posts: 80,659
|
09-21-2017, 11:35 AM | #96 |
Beyond the Rapids
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Langley, VA
Casino cash: $-370000
|
Everyone I know there who's marginally a sports fan watches at least some NFL. There's just no team for them to unify behind, the way they do for the Blue Jays. (Even people out on the prairies see the Blue Jays as 'their' team.)
For the NFL, you have a smattering of random, usually northern teams, or just "I'm a fan of the NFL" |
Posts: 80,659
|
09-21-2017, 11:44 AM | #97 | |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
Quote:
Georgia unexpectedly moved the team from Los Angeles to Anaheim, which is basically like moving the Chiefs to St. Louis. Plus, a new Light Rail line will be available soon, which will have a station near Kroenke World and the home of the Clippers, which is slated to be across the street. |
|
Posts: 88,960
|
09-21-2017, 11:45 AM | #98 | ||
Mindful Taoist German
Join Date: Aug 2000
Casino cash: $8081662
|
I'm guessing this was ****ing Irony...
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
Posts: 74,234
|
09-21-2017, 12:02 PM | #99 |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
http://thebiglead.com/2017/09/20/sis...source=twitter
SI's Lee Jenkins: Spanos Family, Chargers Couldn't Have Imagined This Level Of Anger, Ridicule By: Ryan Phillips Lee Jenkins joined the Darren Smith Show on 1090 AM in San Diego on Wednesday and went off on the Los Angeles Chargers and their owner, Dean Spanos. Jenkins is Sports Illustrated’s senior NBA writer, but he’s a native of San Diego and has been a long-time critic of the Chargers. That didn’t change during this interview. Jenkins claims the Spanos family did not expect this level of anger from San Diego fans or this level of national public humiliation from the Chargers move. He also discussed the NFL’s reaction and how he believes other owners will soon be throwing Spanos under the bus as things get worse in LA. The Spanoses did this to themselves. Absolutely no one outside of that family and its inner circle thought moving to Los Angeles was a wise decision. Now the franchise is a national laughingstock and it’s only getting worse. In a city and surrounding area of 18.1 million people, the Chargers couldn’t find enough of their own fans to fill a tiny soccer stadium in their first week in a new home. At least half of the fans in the crowd in Week 2 were cheering for the Miami Dolphins, a team whose fanbase doesn’t travel particularly well. This weekend the Chargers welcome the Kansas City Chiefs to town. The Chiefs have a rabid fanbase who could wind up outnumbering Chargers fans in their own stadium. Expect to see a lot of red on Sunday in that crowd. And expect things to keep getting worse for Spanos and co. in Los Angeles. |
Posts: 88,960
|
09-21-2017, 12:04 PM | #100 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jul 2009
Casino cash: $2774064
|
Quote:
If they don't, they won't. |
|
Posts: 81,217
|
09-21-2017, 03:00 PM | #101 | |
Three-Pat
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Colorado Springs
Casino cash: $1895053
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 16,974
|
09-21-2017, 05:18 PM | #102 |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
|
Posts: 88,960
|
09-21-2017, 05:19 PM | #103 |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
The Athletic’s Don Banks joined the Darren Smith Show on 1090 AM in San Diego on Thursday to discuss the disastrous Los Angeles Chargers. This week, Banks wrote a piece about how quickly things have gone south for Dean Spanos and his team in LA and during the interview he went ever further. Banks even suggested the NFL is quietly talking about forcing the team back to San Diego. Banks has talked to a number of people inside the league and when asked what they think of Spanos, his response was telling:
“I have been painted a picture from people I’ve talked to that the league was sympathetic…to Dean Spanos’ plight. Feels like he had been a ‘league guy’ feels like he had waited kind of his turn on the relocation front, thought he had the votes the year before — Jerry Jones and Stan Kroenke pretty much outmaneuvered Dean and Mark Davis with the Raiders to be the first in line for LA. So it was almost as if this was a bit of a make up. “I can tell you this Darren, there are people in the league — including the commissioner — they did not want to see San Diego forsaken. They would rather there be a team in San Diego. If there’s anything viable that they could find to put the league back in to San Diego, I think they will be in that camp strongly.” When discussing the optics of empty stadiums and the Chargers not being able to fill a 27,000-seat stadium with their own fans, Banks had this to say: “They’re saying the right things now and they’re going to keep a stiff upper lip and say that ‘we knew that this was going to be a hard slog uphill.’ There’s a lot of concern already. And there’s a lot of people who are thinking, ‘How can we put up with these optics for the next three years if the Chargers can’t improve the situation in Carson?'” When asked if he believed the league was possibly talking about forcing the Chargers back to San Diego if things don’t improve, Banks was blunt: “I think they’re talking about it. I do. I think there’s already a level of concern at how far south it’s gone, that there are at least people talking about it…I don’t think a true tipping point has been reached, it’s too early for that. But I think there’s enough concern that people are saying, ‘What’s the best option perhaps among bad options?'” The fact that we’re heading into Week 3 of the regular season and people around the league are already talking about moving the Chargers back to San Diego is simply incredible. |
Posts: 88,960
|
|
|