Chiefs Decision to be made on #1 four days before draft - Page 19

Hog's Gone Fishin · 04-01-2013, 05:17 PM

According to NFL network. Reid and Dorsey have narrowed it down to 4 players and meet three times a day to discuss. They report the final decision will be made 4 days before the draft. Also report that Albert has no intention of showing up at this time because he expects to be traded.

So who are the 4 ?

Just Passin' By · 04-01-2013, 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dtchiefs4life

Take the best guy in this draft yes. Who knows who is coming out next year and where we'll be draft position wise

So, as I've been saying, this is about you hugging Geno's nuts. You don't care if they're sold on him. You want them to take a shot, as you put it.

ChiefAshhole20 · 04-01-2013, 10:35 PM

Geno will be the best QB prospect available to us for the next 5 years, lock him up so we don't have to worry about the QB position for another decade hopefully. We don't need Joeckel or Fisher, keep Albert and draft a RT in the 3-4th round if you're concerned about tackle play. I'd be a fan of Dion Jordan, if we can't trade or don't pick Geno, I'd be happy with a versatile pass rusher.

Mother****erJones · 04-01-2013, 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By

So, as I've been saying, this is about you hugging Geno's nuts. You don't care if they're sold on him. You want them to take a shot, as you put it.

Geno's the best guy in this draft. Nothing to do with "hugging his nuts". If they take him theyre sold on him. They have to be somewhat sold on him if theyre bringing him in for a visit. Might be a smokescreen to drum up interest

Mother****erJones · 04-01-2013, 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By

So, as I've been saying, this is about you hugging Geno's nuts. You don't care if they're sold on him. You want them to take a shot, as you put it.

You must really love Geno's nuts because that's all you talk about

**wazu** · 04-01-2013, 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR

Or you draft his replacement now.

When you get sick of his bullshit in two years, then you've got a new guy who's had time to adjust to the pros.

And if he unprecedentedly becomes what Drew Brees was for New Orleans, then who the **** cares? You've got a franchise QB. Trade Geno, take the loss, either way it doesn't matter. You've got the franchise QB and are ready to kick some ass.

I don't see how this plan is a terrible idea.

That's because it's a great ****ing idea. When you don't have a lights-out, franchise QB, your first, last, and only ****ing job every year should be to swing for the fences to find one. Once you find one, then I'll get all hot and bothered by the awesome fat guys you draft and free agents you sign.

Just Passin' By · 04-01-2013, 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dtchiefs4life

Geno's the best guy in this draft. Nothing to do with "hugging his nuts".

It's got everything to do with hugging his nuts. You're curling up with them like a Friday night date.

Quote:

Originally Posted by dtchiefs4life

If they take him theyre sold on him. They have to be somewhat sold on him if theyre bringing him in for a visit. Might be a smokescreen to drum up interest

Teams bring in players that they have no intention of drafting.

What if the Chiefs decide that Manuel is going to be the best QB in the long run, and they draft him. Are you going to be alright with that?

**RealSNR** · 04-01-2013, 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By

I don't hate Smith. If the Chiefs are sold on the guy, they should take him. If they're not sold, they shouldn't. It's that simple. Taking the guy because the Chiefs haven't done it in a long time is the sort of dumbass shit that a ballhugger like you might be into, but it doesn't help the team in the long run.

Were the Ravens 100% sold on Flacco? Were the Steelers 100% sold on Roethlisberger? Were the Packers 100% sold on Rodgers?

Drafting QBs is just as much a faith thing as it is a scouting thing. Andrew Lucks almost never ****ing happen. If there's the slightest possibility that your coaching staff can work with a guy and make him into something great, you gotta go get him.

Carl was 100% a QB atheist, if you could call it that. He even said so himself. He hated rookie QBs and the stress it took to play them and watch them struggle and work through their transition to the pros. Pioli was a dumbass who didn't feel comfortable with anybody who wasn't a ****ing sycophant.

We've finally got the QB coach we've always needed in KC. If he thinks Geno has stuff, it's gotta happen.

Just Passin' By · 04-01-2013, 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dtchiefs4life

You must really love Geno's nuts because that's all you talk about

Well, your posts are really ****ing stupid, and they're based entirely on "GENO!", with no attempt at thought.

Mother****erJones · 04-01-2013, 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By

It's got everything to do with hugging his nuts. You're curling up with them like a Friday night date.

Teams bring in players that they have no intention of drafting.

What if the Chiefs decide that Manuel is going to be the best QB in the long run, and they draft him. Are you going to be alright with that?

Yes completely. I like Manuel. If he's there in the 3rd sure. I know teams bring in guys for just visits thats it

Mother****erJones · 04-01-2013, 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By

Well, your posts are really ****ing stupid, and they're based entirely on "GENO!", with no attempt at thought.

My posts are stupid because I want this franchise to take the best QB prospect in this draft?

Mother****erJones · 04-01-2013, 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By

Well, your posts are really ****ing stupid, and they're based entirely on "GENO!", with no attempt at thought.

I dont feel like bringing up stats and getting into an all out debate right now. Ive stated my reason and there's nothing wrong with it

Just Passin' By · 04-01-2013, 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR

Were the Ravens 100% sold on Flacco? Were the Steelers 100% sold on Roethlisberger? Were the Packers 100% sold on Rodgers?

None of them were taken at #1, or even in the top 10. However, the Ravens traded down, and then traded back up to get Flacco, and the Packers had the luxury of letting Rodgers ride the pine for years while they fixed any problems and developed him.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR

Drafting QBs is just as much a faith thing as it is a scouting thing. Andrew Lucks almost never ****ing happen.

I agree.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR

If there's the slightest possibility that your coaching staff can work with a guy and make him into something great, you gotta go get him.

That's the sort of thinking that gets you JaMarcus Russell.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR

Carl was 100% a QB atheist, if you could call it that. He even said so himself. He hated rookie QBs and the stress it took to play them and watch them struggle and work through their transition to the pros. ***** was a dumbass who didn't feel comfortable with anybody who wasn't a ****ing sycophant.

We've finally got the QB coach we've always needed in KC. If he thinks Geno has stuff, it's gotta happen.

If they're confident Geno is the guy, they should take him, and not worry about A. Smith's ego. If they're doubtful, they shouldn't, unless they're doubtful about every other player in the draft, as well. You don't draft a player just because you haven't drafted the position in a long time.

Just Passin' By · 04-01-2013, 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dtchiefs4life

My posts are stupid because I want this franchise to take the best QB prospect in this draft?

Your posts are stupid for the reasons I've laid out. You were wrong about SB QBs, even as you kept changing the arguments, you weren't being truthful about not caring about a specific QB, and so on.

Mother****erJones · 04-01-2013, 10:51 PM

The different between KC and the Jamarcus Russell pick is we have a good talent evalting department and competent coaching staff and QB guru.

Mother****erJones · 04-01-2013, 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By

Your posts are stupid for the reasons I've laid out. You were wrong about SB QBs, even as you kept changing the arguments, you weren't being truthful about not caring about a specific QB, and so on.

Im not changing argument about SB QBs. Ive argued that elite QBs have won them the past like 10 to 15 years. Not the past 40 years of QBs. Thats like trying to say oh a dominating 85 bears D will win a super bowl now. Not really. Its a passing league, you need a franchise QB to win and a good enough defense

04-01-2013, 05:17 PM
Hog's Gone Fishin Fish are scared of me Join Date: Nov 2001 Casino cash: $1730477	Decision to be made on #1 four days before draft According to NFL network. Reid and Dorsey have narrowed it down to 4 players and meet three times a day to discuss. They report the final decision will be made 4 days before the draft. Also report that Albert has no intention of showing up at this time because he expects to be traded. So who are the 4 ?
Posts: 40,331

04-01-2013, 10:35 PM	#272
ChiefAshhole20 Starter Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Houston, TX Casino cash: $10005862	Geno will be the best QB prospect available to us for the next 5 years, lock him up so we don't have to worry about the QB position for another decade hopefully. We don't need Joeckel or Fisher, keep Albert and draft a RT in the 3-4th round if you're concerned about tackle play. I'd be a fan of Dion Jordan, if we can't trade or don't pick Geno, I'd be happy with a versatile pass rusher.
Posts: 575