NFL Draft 2nd rnd. Geno, Wilson, Barkley, Glennon gone... - Page 9

Mr_Tomahawk · 11:55 AM

Given Dorseys comments the other day about not being a clear cut QB at #1....lets assume we do not draft a QB in the 1st and say Geno, Wilson, Glennon, and Barkley are gone by the 2nd rnd.

Who do you think we go after [qb] and in what rnd?

Frankie · 02-21-2013, 10:15 AM

Trading back into the 1st is not my favorite scenario. If we don't trade down and if we pass on a QB with our 1st pick, we might as well draft a QB with our 2nd rounder. No sense trading back into the first and lose draft picks for it.

htismaqe · 02-21-2013, 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie

Trading back into the 1st is not my favorite scenario. If we don't trade down and if we pass on a QB with our 1st pick, we might as well draft a QB with our 2nd rounder. No sense trading back into the first and lose draft picks for it.

That assumes that a QB is there at #34.

Both options leave a very REAL chance that we end up with NOTHING.

O.city · 02-21-2013, 10:22 AM

The reason I and a few others are so against not taking a QB at 1 is taht it takes it out of your hands whether you get your guy. If they like Wilson alot and want him in the second thats fine, but you are taking a risk of not getting your top rated QB and might end up having shit at a position you already have a huge crater at.

I'm tired of not having our choice in our hands during the draft.

UK_Chief · 02-21-2013, 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe

Seriously?

It's been discussed probably 1000 times.

I've seen people talking about trading down but not up from the 2nd to a mid first.

UK_Chief · 02-21-2013, 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe

That assumes that a QB is there at #34.

Both options leave a very REAL chance that we end up with NOTHING.

Exactly!

htismaqe · 02-21-2013, 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city

The reason I and a few others are so against not taking a QB at 1 is taht it takes it out of your hands whether you get your guy. If they like Wilson alot and want him in the second thats fine, but you are taking a risk of not getting your top rated QB and might end up having shit at a position you already have a huge crater at.

I'm tired of not having our choice in our hands during the draft.

THIS.

htismaqe · 02-21-2013, 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UK_Chief

I've seen people talking about trading down but not up from the 2nd to a mid first.

Even though I'm just messing with you, it has been discussed many, many times.

Frankie · 02-21-2013, 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UK_Chief

I've seen people talking about trading down but not up from the 2nd to a mid first.

Trading down, will net us a bunch of extra picks. Trading back up into the mid 1st will COST us a bunch of extra picks. Apples and dingleberries.

O.city · 02-21-2013, 12:16 PM

WE AREN'T GOING TO BE ABLE TO TRADE DOWN. MOVE ON FROM THAT.

RunKC · 02-21-2013, 12:41 PM

In recent mocks, Wilson and either Barkley/Glennon are there in round 2.

I'm a Wilson homer, so I wouldn't mind if we took a good player at 1 and Wilson at 2 if we really thought Wilson was the best.

htismaqe · 02-21-2013, 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie

Trading down, will net us a bunch of extra picks. Trading back up into the mid 1st will COST us a bunch of extra picks. Apples and dingleberries.

Our pick is untradeable.

Sorter · 02-21-2013, 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC

In recent mocks, Wilson and either Barkley/Glennon are there in round 2.

I'm a Wilson homer, so I wouldn't mind if we took a good player at 1 and Wilson at 2 if we really thought Wilson was the best.

If Wilson is available to AZ, I can't see them passing on him. Or NY for that matter. ****, even Buffalo.

htismaqe · 02-21-2013, 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC

In recent mocks, Wilson and either Barkley/Glennon are there in round 2.

I'm a Wilson homer, so I wouldn't mind if we took a good player at 1 and Wilson at 2 if we really thought Wilson was the best.

What player? What do we need that bad?

Joeckel or Star + Wilson? **** no. The only combo that would make sense is Milliner + Wilson and then you're risking being able to get Wilson at all.

Take Wilson #1, there will be 2 or 3 CBs that are almost as good as Milliner that we could nab at #34.

Mr_Tomahawk · 02-24-2013, 05:53 PM

Well....since Alex Smith will be our starter next year, I am pretty sure you can say goodbye to Geno.

Cassel will most likely be cut. Who are you wanting NOW.

This sucks.

Mr_Tomahawk · 04-07-2013, 03:38 PM

Changing mine to Dysert in the 3rd.

02-17-2013, 06:54 AM
Mr_Tomahawk Prestige Worldwide Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Spring Hill, KS Casino cash: $89055	2nd rnd. Geno, Wilson, Barkley, Glennon gone... Given Dorseys comments the other day about not being a clear cut QB at #1....lets assume we do not draft a QB in the 1st and say Geno, Wilson, Glennon, and Barkley are gone by the 2nd rnd. Who do you think we go after [qb] and in what rnd? Last edited by Mr_Tomahawk; 02-17-2013 at 11:55 AM..
Posts: 10,242

02-21-2013, 10:15 AM	#121
Frankie Banned Join Date: Jul 2001 Casino cash: $163018	Trading back into the 1st is not my favorite scenario. If we don't trade down and if we pass on a QB with our 1st pick, we might as well draft a QB with our 2nd rounder. No sense trading back into the first and lose draft picks for it.
Posts: 27,013

02-21-2013, 10:22 AM	#123
O.city MVP Join Date: Jul 2009 Casino cash: $87100	The reason I and a few others are so against not taking a QB at 1 is taht it takes it out of your hands whether you get your guy. If they like Wilson alot and want him in the second thats fine, but you are taking a risk of not getting your top rated QB and might end up having shit at a position you already have a huge crater at. I'm tired of not having our choice in our hands during the draft.
Posts: 20,424

02-21-2013, 12:16 PM	#129
O.city MVP Join Date: Jul 2009 Casino cash: $87100	WE AREN'T GOING TO BE ABLE TO TRADE DOWN. MOVE ON FROM THAT.
Posts: 20,424

02-21-2013, 12:41 PM	#130
RunKC Just a humble bounty hunter Join Date: Apr 2012 Casino cash: $26825	In recent mocks, Wilson and either Barkley/Glennon are there in round 2. I'm a Wilson homer, so I wouldn't mind if we took a good player at 1 and Wilson at 2 if we really thought Wilson was the best. __________________
Posts: 3,551

02-24-2013, 05:53 PM	#134
Mr_Tomahawk Prestige Worldwide Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Spring Hill, KS Casino cash: $89055	Well....since Alex Smith will be our starter next year, I am pretty sure you can say goodbye to Geno. Cassel will most likely be cut. Who are you wanting NOW. This sucks. __________________ Adopt-A-Chief: Tyler Bray
Posts: 10,242

04-07-2013, 03:38 PM	#135
Mr_Tomahawk Prestige Worldwide Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Spring Hill, KS Casino cash: $89055	Changing mine to Dysert in the 3rd. __________________ Adopt-A-Chief: Tyler Bray
Posts: 10,242

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode