Quote:
Originally Posted by GoWalrus
Russell Wilson's team won 58-0 in a game where he only had to throw 13 passes man....
To suggest he wasn't hidden somewhat by a vastly superior supporting cast is bullshit.
Guess what his record was when the Seahawks had to throw more than 30 times?
1-3....
|
you're cherry picking stats...
that's one game that got WAY out of hand.
I agree with you. The Hawks are WAY more talented than the Colts. ESPECIALLY on defense.
The Hawks were NEVER in position for the entire year to have to break off gameplan and go into PASS mode.
So just because the Colts were always in pass mode for a coach who is a pass heavy coach...Luck is better because he threw SO many more passes? Why? What? Doesn't make any sense.
Anybody who watched Russell Wilson for the last two months and wasn't impressed is insane.
If you want to argue that Luck is more talented than Wilson be my guest. That's a totally valid argument. 100% valid.
He was not better in 2012, though. He wasn't a better passer. He just wasn't.
By STARTING NFL QB metric (and not factoring in the fact he was a rookie) he was MEDIOCRE this year. Plain and simple. He was mediocre and was clutch in crunch time. That's how you can define Luck's 2012.