Quote:
Originally Posted by Nightfyre
We don't have an official Zac Dysert thread in the lounge, so I thought I would start one. I think Dysert is the most underrated QB prospect in the draft.
Here, he is playing arguably one of the best teams in the nation last year. He probably leads his team to a victory if his wide receivers don't drop over a half dozen passes.
Zac Dysert has one thing no one else in this draft class has: The ball explodes out of his hand and gets on top of a receiver much more quickly than any other QB in this class - and consistently. In other words, his ability to drive the ball on short, intermediate and even some deep routes is unmatched by any other QB in this class. This was supported by second round stats analysis which indicates a very high level of accuracy to both the intermediate and deep levels.
I think Dysert would be an ideal project QB for Andy Reid to develop behind a starter, even if as a backup plan or develop-and-trade prospect. He would shine in Andy Reid's system consisting of a deep-to-shallow progression based on timing routes because of his ability to get the ball on a rope AT ANY LEVEL of the field.
However, Dysert is a one to two year project, imo. He must be taught to read defenses and work a progression. However, his upside as a pocket passer is tremendous and as a result, he is the third rated QB on my QB Big Board. Discuss.
|
The Big 10 was kind of crappy last season. I know OSU went undefeated but in reality, the Cal game they lose if it's played anywhere other than the Horse Shoe, they needed an overtime to beat Purdue... It's not like they were Bama or A&M.
Back to the topic though, a prototypical NFL QB such as Nassib or Dysert would have been a safe choice. Of course the ****ing Giants get Nassib
Oh well, they'll probably train him and then trade him for a high ransom later.
Dysert throws
SUCCESSFULLY into tight windows and has pretty good pocket awareness.