Quote:
Originally Posted by the Talking Can
it's the same old ****ing excuses
people just want to pretend they have some principled reason for defending 30 years of failed dependence on backups and vet QBs....
because the truth is, "oh no, it risky!" is all anyone is ever saying and it isn't high minded or pragmatic, it's just ****ing stupid
|
Its crazy that fans have no way of differentiating the last 30 years from last years draft.
Nothing the Chiefs have or haven't done and for that matter will do in the future, has a damn thing to do with how shitty a QB class 2012 was.
The fact some of you cant separate that fact is what makes you crazy.
Clark did not tell Dorsey and Reid they weren't allowed to draft a QB at 1.1, I know some of you tin foil hat wearing space cadets believe that.
Its not even a monetary risk now with the new rookie slotting system.
Had there been a franchise QB in this draft I feel confident Reid would have said thats my guy, just like he did with McNabb.
You can want a franchise QB to be there all day long, that doesn't make it true.
I think it was Parcell's who said "Need is a horrible talent evaluator" and that is extremely relevant to his last draft.
Have the Chiefs ****ed up royally on QB's over the last 30 years? Yes thats obvious.That still doesn't change the options available in the 2012 draft.
I think Bray may have been the best bargain of the entire QB class.