Quote:
Originally Posted by tatorhog
All I'm saying is, and o.city reinforced it, despite his attempt to discredit me.
If G is a need, and there is a damn good guard available, why not take him? Its not reaching. I agree, a lot of damn good Gs come out in the later rounds. The only way I would see it as a shit move is if we left comparable talent on the board at a bigger positional need.
I would prefer to see FS, and follow the pattern shown by Seattle in having 2 stud safeties, but by time we pick, there may not be a guy better than Comings or Abdullah.
|
Because you don't draft for need. If need and ability and player match up, sure. But you don't go into year draft thinks "we have a hole at guard, gotta take 1 in the first round".
Guard is also of low positional value compared to say, a pass rusher or wide wr.