Quote:
Originally Posted by RunKC
I did like Lynch. Staylor and media people like Matt Miller were right that he was a moron.
Patrick Mahomes is better suited for success than Paxton Lynch. He did more at the LOS in college, as well as calling/changing plays which Paxton did not do at Memphis.
Patrick also has Andy Reid coaching him...a proven QB guru.
Wanna guess part of the reason why Carson Wentz looks so good? Philly is running the exact same offense as we are. It's Andy Reid's playbook and it's extremely QB friendly.
|
If Reid is such a QB whisperer why has he stuck by alice for so long? Anyone can design an O where the QB can throw the ball quickly to the LOS. It is designing the downfield stuff and having his QB execute it which separates the men from the boys.
Mahhomes has a great arm and can move around in the pocket, time will tell if he can do it consistently enough at the NFL level. Hitting on a QB draft pick is so hard the chefs haven't even bothered drafting one in foreverS. He will have his moments, even Trevor looks good at times. Will Mmahomes be able to protect the ball as well as alice is going to the big question. Guys with big arms throw lots of INT's because they have the balls to try to fit it in anywhere, unlike alice, but your team needs to win the turnover battle to win games. That would be my concern with starting a 1st time starter next year.