Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry
Which is weird bc Steele is normally pretty good overall.
|
Yeah. There's something about the way Missouri plays that corrupts his prediction regarding the Tigers.
Not sure if it is related to the spread offense, which is able to plug and play guys in at WR and RB and even QB a little more easily than a more traditional offense. But that makes a little sense to me.
Steele has predicted HUGE drop offs for Mizzou after losing Daniel, then again after losing Gabbert. He also didn't see much improvement coming for 2010, despite the Tigers returning basically everything except for Danario Alexander.