View Single Post
Old 02-24-2014, 07:18 PM   #585
planetdoc planetdoc is offline
Veteran
 

Join Date: Apr 2012
Casino cash: $9995865
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sorter View Post
Wrong.
how so?
looking more closely I actually see 7 players rushing.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Sorter View Post
He isn't advocating anything. That's our basic "sub" alignment (2-3-6).
I know that. Others have made it clear that he is advocating a hybrid 3-4/4-3.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sorter View Post
Jesus, do you watch the ****ing games?
I do, thanks for asking. Do you watch the games?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sorter View Post
Additionally, the last sentence is so pathetically ignorant, I don't know how to respond.
Having a lack of words is really going to make it difficult for you to get your point across on a message board.

Since this individual has a lack of words, can someone else enlighten me on what is ignorant about it? here is my statement below:

Quote:
They tend not to lineup as a traditional 4 down lineman. In that case, other than DJ, the chiefs would send the remaining 6 players into coverage with dbs.
Houston + Hali + Poe + DJ + down lineman = 5 players
11 defensive players on the field - 5 players mentioned = 6 remaining players.

Chiefs tend not to use other linebackers or lineman, which would only leave defensive backs (corners, safties). Seems pretty accurate to me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sorter View Post
A doctor who thinks "alot" is a word
A lot. is that easier for you to understand?
That is a propoganda technique called, "nitpicking or splitting hairs"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sorter View Post
and doesn't understand football.
I dont have all the answers. I am here to learn. That is the benefit of a messageboard, to share ideas and gain understanding.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sorter View Post
In addition, if you think Poe and the other down lineman are the only ones responsible for gaps, you need to get a copy of Gap Integrity for Mongoloids: The Extremely Simple Edition.
when did I say that? this is a propoganda technique (or debating technique) called "putting words in others mouths", or "misleading inferences."
This can also be thought of "misrepresenting my position."

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sorter View Post
Well, that's incredibly insightful. Since you aren't even remotely knowledgeable about this subject, you should probably shut the **** up and prevent others from having to read your insane drivel.
I disagree with your opinion. This is a propoganda technique called, "Ad hominen, or condescension"
Posts: 2,174
planetdoc has disabled reputation
    Reply With Quote