Quote:
Originally Posted by ActiveShooter
Between Homoerectus and Homosapien, there's many micro evolutionary steps that have been discovered. That proves the possibility of a link between erectus and sapiens. Doesn't disprove a "clean sheet" design ie creationism, but what we have in front of us is what we have. The missing link is the "ape" that macro evolved into Homoerectus while all other primates stayed primitive.
Darwin didn't have knowledge of DNA and that's where it's getting exciting. Early DNA discoveries made darwinists jump to conclusions to fit their belief, their faith. Pigs, and Apes share a lot of DNA markers, so therefore they are relatives they espoused. Here again, jumping to a conclusion to fit an agenda or belief is another handicap of man. Recent DNA discovery unlocking more about DNA and is revealing that we're no more related by DNA than saying that our bodies are 90% water so we must be related.
I'm fine with either evolution or creation, because it doesn't disprove God, Christ, or the demon that I unfortunately know. Whether it's creation through a mythical poof or through a mythical macro evolution, doesn't matter to me.
|
The problem with this is nobody seems to understand that nobody is saying we evolved from a monkey to homoerectus to homsapiens. All that it is saying is that we share a common ancestor.