Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58
If you're talking to me...
Yes. I would agree with that assessment.
Now - how would you compare that core to the "core" of Oakland, Buffalo, Cleveland, Miami and Jacksonville over the past 4 years?
|
Let's just take OAK. The only position I'd trade with them would be their DTs. Different scheme, of course, but they're stout along the line.
Cleveland is interesting. Better OT play, overall. Pretty close in terms of WR and RB play.
They also have a #1 CB.
In terms of age, they might be better situated than KC, but it's damn close.