Thread: Football The Browns should only take a QB in the 2014 first round if he's a sure thing
View Single Post
Old 09-18-2013, 06:41 PM   #114
RealSNR RealSNR is offline
Special Teams ACE!!!
 
RealSNR's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Where the hell is SNR
Casino cash: $2350208
Quote:
Originally Posted by -King- View Post
Who's said anything about a QB having to be a sure thing? Both sides of the argument love twisting the words of the other side. No one knows if ANYONE is a sure thing, bu the whole "just try until you find one" argument is stupid as shit.

I mean... are people saying they should invest an extremely high pick and millions of dollars just to say they tried? That's just stupid.

Drafting someone just to draft someone is how you fail.
So if Teddy Bridgewater isn't all that, what do the Browns do? Not draft a QB?

Cam Newton would be a sexy-ass trade if they could pull it off, but then what does Carolina do?

They'd just be drafting a QB just to draft one then, right? And they can't do that. So... RT?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reaper16 View Post
I would read an entire blog of SNR breaking down athletes' musical capabilities like draft scouting reports.
Posts: 90,448
RealSNR is obviously part of the inner Circle.RealSNR is obviously part of the inner Circle.RealSNR is obviously part of the inner Circle.RealSNR is obviously part of the inner Circle.RealSNR is obviously part of the inner Circle.RealSNR is obviously part of the inner Circle.RealSNR is obviously part of the inner Circle.RealSNR is obviously part of the inner Circle.RealSNR is obviously part of the inner Circle.RealSNR is obviously part of the inner Circle.RealSNR is obviously part of the inner Circle.
     Reply With Quote