Austin, if you're going to accuse people of not accepting overwhelming facts then please don't commit the same fallacy.
TechCrunch has run multiple articles on this subject and concluded that h264 accounts for roughly 66% of the video on the web. That's a hell of a lot. So, when you say the Touch devices don't get most of the video, you would be wrong.
Plus, if you're going to accuse people of assuming out comes how bout not assuming WebM is going to be standard.
Also, there is no fight between h264 and HTML5, which you posted here:
Quote:
|
The facts regarding its overall usability when the web has a ton of Flash and they refuse to support it.. instead banking on a technology that has yet to arrive in quantity (h.264 over html5) and may never arrive (html5 more likely to adopt WebM)
|
Those are not mutually exclusive things. HTML5 can support h264, just like HTML4 has. So there isn't something over something else, especially when they're not of the same class.