Quote:
Originally Posted by Halfcan
Yeah, too bad it was not accurate like TV5 creating a false narrative and insinuating Hill broke his kid's arm or the Star which took that narrative at face value and tried to bury Reek without an ounce of evidence.
They have set the bar pretty high on this story!!
The paid professionals have been 100% wrong from the start, but people are complaining that some part-time bloggers trying to find the real truth are not writing War and Peace with 100% accuracy.  |
Yeah, pretty much. It's not like they got bad info from a source. It was easily debunked and there is no excuse for it.
"...we framed it as highly dubious."
Then research it or don't publish it.