Thread: Football Solving the Redskin Dilemma
View Single Post
Old 11-01-2013, 08:22 AM   #57
donkhater donkhater is offline
Brilliant!!
 
donkhater's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Indiana, USA
Casino cash: $14151
This whole argument for changing the name has next to zero credibility.

1. If it is offensive now, it was offensive X number of years ago when the team was founded.

2. The name "Washington Redskins" is a brand. If Snyder thought he would gain a larger fanbase by changing the name, or lose a large number of fans for NOT changing the name, he'd do it in a heart beat.

3. This idea of pacifiying people who are offended by something rarely achieves anything. I doubt there has been anyone in the history of the US that has been impacted in their life because the football team in Washington DC name their club "Redskins".

This needs to be put in the trash heap of meaningless debates yesterday.
__________________
The welfare of humanity is always the alibi of tyrants
Posts: 3,994
donkhater 's adopt a chief was Sabby Piscitellidonkhater 's adopt a chief was Sabby Piscitellidonkhater 's adopt a chief was Sabby Piscitellidonkhater 's adopt a chief was Sabby Piscitellidonkhater 's adopt a chief was Sabby Piscitellidonkhater 's adopt a chief was Sabby Piscitellidonkhater 's adopt a chief was Sabby Piscitellidonkhater 's adopt a chief was Sabby Piscitellidonkhater 's adopt a chief was Sabby Piscitellidonkhater 's adopt a chief was Sabby Piscitellidonkhater 's adopt a chief was Sabby Piscitelli
  Reply With Quote