Quote:
Originally Posted by GoWalrus
Improving, but still darn near the worst safety in the league in every measurable way.
Hilarious.
That is the DEFINITION OF SUCK, friend. Why ignore facts?
His last season there he gave up SIX touchdowns. 65th rated safety. Texans fans HATED him.
Your bias far outweighs any facts I bring unfortunately.
|
My bias? That's rich.
You've been after the guy his entire career. And the only reason you defended cutting him was because you had doe eyes for Scott Pioli.
You're right - Ozzie Newsome doesn't know shit about football. He should've listened to PFF instead of bringing in a guy that unquestionably added to his football team.
PFF will continue to blister Pollard for not being good in coverage and continue to fail to show the impact he has on guys that come across the middle against the Ravens. Listen to guys in the league talk about playing against him - they
hate it. Why? Because he's the same guy he's always been. He's a damn assassin that brings anger and intensity to a defense in a game that is
fueled by anger and intensity.
He's exactly the kind of player this defense is missing and we had him on our roster.
But you and Billay are right, Pioli was completely correct in keeping guys like Tim Castille, Sean Ryan, Derek Mays and Demarrio Williams instead of him. Men that left the organization and had stellar careers like Mike Brown and Mike Richardson.
Because that's the argument you're making. That the Chiefs were
smart to cut Bernard Pollard in favor of Mike Brown.
Defend that one for me, bucko. Go ahead and show me how cutting Bernard Pollard for Mike Brown was a smart decision to make in either the short or long terms.
It wasn't. It never was and never has been. It was a shortsighted decision made by an idiot general manager and defended by ditto-heads who still can't bring themselves to admit the obvious.