Quote:
Originally Posted by HMc
Your brokedick analysis appears to assume the following:
- that Geno offers "roughly the same ceiling" as Bray [citation required];
- that players either hit their ceiling or fall to the floor [citation required];and
- all players have the same % chance of hitting their ceiling or falling to the floor.
The reason no team was even willing to spend even a 7 on Bray is that they all formed the view that there is barely a snowflake's shot in hell of him being productive in the NFL. All this "high ceiling" shit is down to him having a big arm and that's it. The QB is the most important position on the field. If there's a guy there in the 7th that has even a 5% chance of being better than the guys taken at 16 and 39, you take him.
Your explanation has been neither clear nor succint - it changes every 2nd post. The only point you've actually made is that you are glad the chiefs didn't spend the 1.1 on Smith. Which is useless really since if they had, he wouldn't have dropped, and we'd all be talking about how he wouldn't have made it past the jaguars at number 2. |
I'm sorry that your reading comprehension is lacking. Again, you're welcome to read back through the thread . . . . .
I haven't changed my position. If you don't agree with it, fine. So be it.
Yes, I am glad the Chiefs did not spend 1.1 on Geno Smith. I think I'll take my chances siding with the majority of NFL scouts opinions over the opinions of the pro-Geno crowd.
I'm sorry if that upsets you.