Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut
No you didn't. The availability doesn't surface until after you sign a player and it didn't pop up until just the last week or two anyway.
You put the guy on your roster (or chose to extend him) without bothering to even check to see if he's played the last 2 years. That's entirely on you.
There was no way for you to 'trust his site' before you signed him. You simply didn't do your homework and now you're trying to blame CD for it.
To me, this is a perfect example of why FA shouldn't be allowed during the season. You ****ed up - live with it. When an NFL team doesn't prepare and ends up with holes in the roster, it gets to go get 'street free agents' - just like we do. The difference is that the NFL has more than 24 teams so there is a pool of legitimate NFL roster players available that aren't available to NFL teams. The present model rewards foresight and depth planning. Yours would encourage the 47 man roster crap that so many have wanted to do and top-heavy roster construction. To hell with that - plan accordingly; it's what real teams have to do.
|
Under Manage roster, He showed 1's for the entire season. Wtf are you talking about? The website showed him being available for the whole season. You're right, I didn't do further research on the punter... but it was a mistake of it showing one thing on a site, vs the reality of it. In real life that wouldn't happen... and in Reality if something happened where a guy ends up not being available for whatever reason, the team has the ability to go out and sign someone else.. Can't do that here.
You're happy someone else didn't do their homework on a player so you want them to suffer. You're trolling, not trying to get the league\game to a better place.