Quote:
Originally Posted by hometeam
McDonalds is successful shit, doesn't make it good~ Ubis is widely consider the WORST AAA publisher, and for good reason. They love to take shortcuts and **** over gamers, and then they feed misinformation to the masses to minimize the impact. They take huge advantage of console players well. ****ing microtransactions to open chests in AC? LOL
And yes, I know Battlefront was EA.. but it was the same type of thing, a bunch of hype, and the game is nearly dead only a few months later. More alive on consoles, but only because the competition is shit.
|
I'll give you the McDonald's comment hhahaha.
Blame Steam/Valve for that bullshit. Buying skins, chest for skins, etc. They opened the door to kids opening up daddy's wallet and spending hundreds on nothing. Hell, you can buy some of that shit in real life for less than they charge on Steam. Ubi is just following suit to reap in big-time $$$.
Most games these days are re-hashed, re-skinned, same old shit. Until Valve releases the next big physics engine, I see little that will change in the gaming industry. And speaking of that, look at how many re-hashes there basically are built on the Source 2 Engine.
Ubi does appeal much more to console gaming because they dont' have a shitload of multiplayer titles that are truly playable as multiplayer games.
The only titles of their's I play is Assassin's Creed and Far Cry. I like the story lines of those, even though both are very much re-hashed from a game play perspective. However, after the 2nd installment of each, I waited years for them to drop under $20 to play them. I'm not about to spend $60+ on re-hashing of titles. I payed less than $10 for each of Brotherhood, Revelations, and III in the AC series and haven't even bought the rest of them yet, although I'm sure I'll dump $20 into buying the rest of them in due time just to finish the story sequence.
I don't just blame Ubi, I think the industry as a whole has been lazier over the past 10 years.