View Single Post
Old 02-25-2015, 02:22 PM   #31
Discuss Thrower Discuss Thrower is offline
"You like to drink?"
 
Discuss Thrower's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: "I like to drink."
Casino cash: $3056869
Quote:
Originally Posted by Just Passin' By View Post
The Steelers have won 2 SBs since 2004, with 1 as a #6 seed. The Giants have also won 2 SBs in recent years, with 1 as a #5 seed. That's 4 easy ones, right there. You just don't know what you're talking about.
I know exactly what I'm talking about.

Either you have one of the best six to eight quarterbacks in the league or you're an also-ran that doesn't have a chance in hell of winning a Super Bowl because there's going to be a good chance there's a better QB will be on the other side of the bracket.

The AFC will be the Andrew Luck show in the next four seasons. The Colts will skull**** a punchless AFC South to a #2 or #1 seed year in and year out as long as he's healthy. It'll be him and Brady battling it out in the conference final until Brady retires with the occasional appearance by a Flacco or Roethlisberger until the latter retires.

On the other side it'll be Rodgers and Wilson with maybe an odd appearance of Eli in the years when they catch the NFC East without legit opposition.

Is Rivers good enough to carry the Chargers to the AFC finals? Nope. Tannehill? Can't do enough to overcome Brady. What's Andy Dalton's playoff record again?

Can Romo beat Rodgers? Can Stafford beat Rodgers? Can either of those guys take down the 'hawks if their defense is on point like it's shown the capability of being? Can Brees do anything without a bounty-hunting mentality defense?

You've done nothing to counter my point that it's truly a six quarterback league, and everyone else are just glorified exhibition games for guys like Brady and Rodgers.
__________________
Chiefs 2016 Opponents:
Home: JAX, TEN, NO, TB, NYJ. Away: HOU, IND, ATL, CAR, PIT
Chiefs 2017 Opponents:
Home: BUF, MIA, PHI, WSH, AFC North. Away: NE, NYJ, NYG, DAL, AFC South
Posts: 42,857
Discuss Thrower is obviously part of the inner Circle.Discuss Thrower is obviously part of the inner Circle.Discuss Thrower is obviously part of the inner Circle.Discuss Thrower is obviously part of the inner Circle.Discuss Thrower is obviously part of the inner Circle.Discuss Thrower is obviously part of the inner Circle.Discuss Thrower is obviously part of the inner Circle.Discuss Thrower is obviously part of the inner Circle.Discuss Thrower is obviously part of the inner Circle.Discuss Thrower is obviously part of the inner Circle.Discuss Thrower is obviously part of the inner Circle.
    Reply With Quote