Quote:
Originally Posted by Brainiac
JFC, are you really this stupid? Those weren't risky picks. Those were SAFE picks.
The closest comparison I can think of is St. Louis insisting upon using the #1 overall pick on Sam Bradford. The jury is still out on that, but the Rams haven't won dick yet with Bradford.
|
no, they weren't
and no one on this board wanted them or would have
they are both the ****ing definition of what Chiefs fan define as risky
they sure as hell weren't "Luck or RGIII"...which is the stated reason we couldn't draft a QB this year