Quote:
Originally Posted by Baby Lee
Maybe we should stop arguing with people who are in entertainment but have no legal training. 
Yes, they have to prove 'intent' and 'prior knowledge,' but they're still working in the world of civil litigation where the propenderance of the evidence and reasonable inferences are well developed concepts.
In other words, Intent and prior knowledge can be 'proven' by reasonable inferences from analysis of strikingly similar, widely distributed, content.
Your take is similar to someone saying 'I can't be convicted of murder, because I haven't confessed.' |
Joe couldn't win but the case was settled out of court.
Good enough for you, Barrister?