Quote:
Originally Posted by SNR
Ordinarily I'd be relieved with that arrangement, but there are so many teams like Buffalo, the Jets, the Raiders, and even the Saints who are currently sucking dick and would be tempted to trade in front of us to grab the best QB. Yeah, it wouldn't be too pricey at all for KC to trade up to the #1 spot themselves just to assure that they get the top QB, but we all know how this organization operates. Sit back, play conservative, let the other teams make the bold moves, and then get caught with your pants down, where you tell the fans, "Gee, there just weren't any QBs available where we picked. Shucks. Oh well."
I know beggars can't be choosers, but ****. If we're going to do this losing thing, let's do it the right way and get the best QB in the draft. And let's conserve our picks, too. Go all out. Get the #1 pick by losing the most games. Then draft the **** out of this shit with our fancy new GM. And ****ing WIN!
|
I feel like the Saints are going to use their pick on the best MLB available and give their defense a heart and soul for the next 10 years.
The Jets and Bills might do something, but I don't see a scenario when KC doesn't have a look at at least two legitimate QB prospects. Maybe not Geno Smith, but Barkley and Wilson will for sure be options.