Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinChief
Actually that's not entirely true (I can address this if you want but TRUE dormancy isn't nearly as common as people think) BUT it doesn't matter if there is a precedent. I expect more than just a good guess when it comes to SCIENCE. Especially when some jagoffs guess was accepted as fact for what? Over a decade?
Anyway, my bitch is that there is far far far too much shoddy "science" in the medical field and the entire field is far too forgiving of it. I'm not some anti-science weirdo who believes in crystals or chiropractors or other voodoo bullshit. Quite the opposite, I just want better, HARDER science with my medicine.
P.S. as I stated that is not MOLECULAR BIOLOGY unless you want to state (which is true) that everything can be REDUCED to molecular biology.
|
Whether you want to reduce it to dormancy or latency it's ultimately semantic.
It wasn't stated as a law, but that was the best assumption given that you had a period of clinical latency for nearly a decade despite evidence of a virus that destroys CD4 cells and other elements of the immune system.
Ultimately, you are expecting better "harder" science there, while conveniently ignoring the litanies of false proclamations made by those you most prize.
Surely you remember the claim that the human genome would find over 2 million unique genes.
__________________
"When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read 'all men are created equal, except negroes, and foreigners, and Catholics.' When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretense of loving liberty – to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocrisy.”--Abraham Lincoln
|