Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Lane
I'm with you. I'd love it to be true but like many non-scientific things I want to see some demonstrable, verifiable proof.
|
Yeah, it would need a working hypothesis backed by some sort of scientific logic before it receives a grant. Then, a legitimate clinical trial would have to be done in order put it into practice.
This is science 101. Trust me, the paranoid ramblings of our resident stoner don't come close to undermining the legitimacy of a very sophisticated scientific population. If there was any sort of logic behind it, I am 100% certain it would garner funding.