Originally Posted by KChiefer
I'm attacking the New York Post mainly. To be perfectly honest I didn't bother to read the OP. Why? Because I already saw this subject posted here a week ago and many ppl got it right the first time which is why that thread died. She did her time, she's allowed to be employed.
You know what speaks volumes about you? Saying she never repented WHEN SHE DID!!!
I'm sure when the FBI apprehends the Boston bombers you'll just start making shit up about them. Have a nice day making shit up.
Like I stated, upon further review she did in fact apologize... while I do have doubts about how genuine said apology was, since it took three failed parole attempts before she saw the light, she did offer it up and I acknowledged it.
And, for the umpteenth time....no one in this thread has said that Columbia did not have the right to hire a terrorist who had done her time, or that she does not have the right to be employed. All that was said was that was morally wrong (which it is), and that Columbia is not immune from the amount of heat and criticism it is taking for making this particular hiring choice.
Of course, I guess expecting a fan of 60's radicals(or terrorists, in this case) such as yourself to know how to read might be asking a bit much.