Originally Posted by mlyonsd
Your example doesn't come close to the reality of Boston.
Multiple bombs set. Bomber(s) don't stick around to face the consequences. That isn't mass murder, the intent is to terrorize. Terrorize in the reality it all could happen again. You don't need a political motive to terrorize. Some sick **** just getting his jollies watching the explosion over and over on tv thinking it would be great to do again before he's caught is terrorism. Maybe not the form you think it is but he has already set in motion the alteration of how we do things in the future publicly. To me, by default, that fits the definition of terrorism.
Using nails and ball bearings I might add~
“With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion"