Originally Posted by notorious
Was terror injected into the country through violence?
Since when does someone need an agenda to terrorize the public?
I think a terrorist act has to be done with the motive of enacting change through violence, not just causing terror. I don't think Lanza had any such motive. Of course, we don't even know who set off the bomb yet in order to know their motive, but it's been dubbed an act of terrorism.