Quote:
Originally Posted by SNR
It was a ****ing fallacy, you moron. For reasons I've already ****ing explained.
A: Drafting a QB in the first round is the most likely way to find a franchise starter. We haven't done so in 30 years. Maybe we should change that.
B: You also haven't vacated all your draft picks. Do you want to change to that strategy?
That's what he ****ing said, right? That's a fallacy. It's the exact same thing as:
A: All my friends built successful football teams by drafting a QB in the first round.
B: If all your friends jumped off a bridge, would you do it too?
|
lol, its so cute when you try to act smart and use intellectual words to prove a point, and then make a really bad point for your argument.
The aspect is extremism, you moron.
And your second A/B reference is misleading and highly off subject.
Of all 32 teams today, the top 16 (successful) rosters were not all put together with QB's from the 1st round.
More importantly going to your first A/B point, he was bringing up an action polarizing your extremist argument, which is, we must draft first round QB's.
You NEVER made a point that 1st round QB's tend to have higher chances at being franchise QB's. You simply stated we had to use our 1st on a QB because we never do it.
You didn't use logic to make your point, which would have sounded like, "We have the 1.1 pick, we can take anybody in the draft. We need a franchise QB and there's a higher percentage chance that our pick will land a Franchise QB than if we chose a QB in the 2nd round".
Had you said that, nobody would ever argue with you, because it is true.
But no,
your reasoning for drafting in a QB wasn't intellectual, or logical. You didn't use reason for suggesting we draft a QB in the 1st round, you used some bogus superstition that you want to break. According to you, we should draft a QB in the 1st round because we haven't done it in a billion years. That, is illogical, sir.