View Single Post
Old 03-20-2013, 03:58 PM   #93
DanT DanT is offline
Veteran
 

Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Davis, CA
Casino cash: $10821
Quote:
Originally Posted by patteeu View Post
Iraq attacked our aircraft in the no fly zone on a regular basis.



The Bush administration made it clear that they believed in a world where nation states no longer necessarily mass troops on a border before waging war on their neighbor, traditional analysis that requires an imminent threat to justify preemptive war can no longer satisfy the security requirements of a modern nation. Agree or disagree, your focus on imminent threat is a strawman. No one claimed that Iraq was a direct and imminent threat to the US homeland.
The focus on an imminent threat is not a strawman. It's charity on my part. In the absence of an imminent threat, then there's not even the possibility for a justifiable preemptive attack on another country. Instead, it would simply be a supreme crime.

Escalating into a war an armed conflict against a weak and contained country because it is attacking planes that fly over it is financially irresponsible, besides being morally bankrupt.
Posts: 3,117
DanT has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.DanT has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.DanT has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.DanT has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.DanT has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.DanT has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.DanT has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.DanT has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.DanT has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.DanT has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.DanT has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.
  Reply With Quote