View Single Post
Old 03-20-2013, 04:58 PM   #93
DanT DanT is offline
Veteran
 

Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Davis, CA
Casino cash: $7911
Quote:
Originally Posted by patteeu View Post
Iraq attacked our aircraft in the no fly zone on a regular basis.



The Bush administration made it clear that they believed in a world where nation states no longer necessarily mass troops on a border before waging war on their neighbor, traditional analysis that requires an imminent threat to justify preemptive war can no longer satisfy the security requirements of a modern nation. Agree or disagree, your focus on imminent threat is a strawman. No one claimed that Iraq was a direct and imminent threat to the US homeland.
The focus on an imminent threat is not a strawman. It's charity on my part. In the absence of an imminent threat, then there's not even the possibility for a justifiable preemptive attack on another country. Instead, it would simply be a supreme crime.

Escalating into a war an armed conflict against a weak and contained country because it is attacking planes that fly over it is financially irresponsible, besides being morally bankrupt.
Posts: 3,097
DanT must have mowed badgirl's lawn.DanT must have mowed badgirl's lawn.DanT must have mowed badgirl's lawn.DanT must have mowed badgirl's lawn.DanT must have mowed badgirl's lawn.DanT must have mowed badgirl's lawn.DanT must have mowed badgirl's lawn.DanT must have mowed badgirl's lawn.DanT must have mowed badgirl's lawn.DanT must have mowed badgirl's lawn.DanT must have mowed badgirl's lawn.
  Reply With Quote