Originally Posted by pr_capone
The banning of "assault" weapons is right out. The banning of large capacity magazines is out. Registration of guns is out. Judging by the response in the poll... mandatory securing of a weapon when not in use is out.
I firmly believe that curbing gun violence in the US begins with education and the enforcement of existing laws. That said... is there any compromise to be had on the gun owner side of the argument?
If you are a gun owner... what would you be willing to compromise to find middle ground on this debate?
What exactly would gun control advocates be compromising? They don't stand to lose anything. How can there be compromise or middle ground when one side isn't actually giving up anything?