Originally Posted by GoWalrus
Turnovers are irrelevant if they don't result in losses.
Luck had no running game and a pretty bad defense. RGIII had a LOT more help.
Luck will be a better QB in the long run and IMO, was last year, too.
4,600 yards and 28 TD is a **** ton of production for a rookie QB.
23/18 TD ratio, 54% completion ratio, including not even half of his passes completed against the Chiefs.
Yes, he was good, especially seeing as the running game was terrible, but he still didn't complete nearly enough of his passes and threw way to many INTs. The Colts were that usual mediocre team that got in and got blasted in the playoffs.
RGIII deserved it more than Luck, simple as that. He was a dynamic player that made the whole offense better.