Originally Posted by GoWalrus
Turnovers are irrelevant if they don't result in losses.
Luck had no running game and a pretty bad defense. RGIII had a LOT more help.
Luck will be a better QB in the long run and IMO, was last year, too.
4,600 yards and 28 TD is a **** ton of production for a rookie QB.
The question you have to ask yourself is whose team would have had a worse record without them at QB.
I say the Colts hands down. Without Luck they are picking right behind us in this years draft. That is how good Luck is and will be even better in the future