Originally Posted by jettio
A lot more people died in Mumbai, Bali, Madrid, and several terrorist and IED attacks in Afghanistan and Iraq. Esp. the one with the suicide bomber in the mess hall.
I think the number of dead people and the number of dead Americans is a better metric for determining the degree of terrorist related tragediness.
Rand Paul made it obvious that he does not know what terrorist related events have occurred since 9/11/2001 because there have been dozens of them and more than several were worse than Benghazi to anyone whose mind is not warped by partisanship.
How many could've been prevented if it weren't for a blatant fail in leadership?